With the development of the Internet age, being questioned seems to have become the fate of literary and artistic workers and literary and artistic works, as well as practitioners of literary and art-related industries, and this question has spread from actors to works, and then to awards, as well as ratings and other aspects.
In terms of awards, after the Golden Eagle Festival experienced a storm that was questioned as "after the water king", the once recognized Golden Eagle Award has become the "water award" in the mouths of countless netizens, and the Golden Eagle Award has not only lost the prestige of one of the three major TV awards, but also lost the trust of many viewers.
Wave after wave, wave after wave. After the Golden Eagle Awards have been controversial for a period of time, the Magnolia Awards have also been questioned because of the credibility of past awards, and have become the target of public criticism because the awards have not been announced but there have been good news in magazines.
Before the two major awards of the three major TV awards have not yet regained their prestige in the hearts of the audience, the Golden Rooster Award, one of the three major film awards, has ushered in a new impact, because after seeing the nomination list of the new Golden Rooster Awards, netizens have bluntly expressed disappointment.
Rather than saying that netizens are disappointed in the Golden Rooster Award, it is better to say that netizens are disappointed in the achievements of most of the film works in this year. At a time when most of the industry's awards were questioned, netizens began to use the "voice of the public" as the criterion for judging the quality of film and television works.
And when it comes to "the voice of the public", we have to mention Douban. Douban is a rare social platform for Chinese audiences to express their evaluations of film and television works, as well as to score film and television works and be trusted by netizens, but unfortunately, this trust has now become precarious.
In recent years, with the birth of more and more so-called traffic, many lists and platforms that were once sought after by netizens have gradually been occupied by "black powder" or "fans", and Douban has become a platform for "black powder" and "fans" to carry out tug-of-war.
The fairness of Douban's rating has been questioned, which is not something that has happened recently, but because Douban has recently been on the cusp of the storm, it has made a lot of noise, and even the official has responded loudly.
Recently, Douban officially released an explanation on the suspected encounter of water military control and evaluation of the two dramas "Wind Rises Luoyang" and "Who is the Murderer".
The fuse of this explanation probably came from the day of the broadcast of "Wind Rise Luoyang" on December 1, because of technical reasons, the content of the episode was launched nearly an hour late, but the one-star and five-star reviews on Douban were released on time.
And shortly after the "Wind Rises Luoyang" rating farce, "Who is the murderer" also had a similar problem.
Only two episodes of "Who is the Murderer" were played on the day of the premiere, and the actor Zhao Liying in these two episodes has not yet appeared, but there are already many evaluations of Zhao Liying's acting skills in "Who is the Murderer" on the day of the premiere.
In less than half a month, two film and television works have faced the situation that the works or actors have not been evaluated before they are online, and the credibility of the Douban score has naturally been questioned as never before.
Combined with the hot discussion caused by the opening score of 5.1 of "Female Psychologist" starring Yang Zi before, for a while, Douban was pushed to the cusp of the storm, and the reputation of Douban was also facing the danger of collapse.
In the face of public doubts and official roll call, Douban had to pay attention to it, and this description detailed every evaluation released at each time was checked and processed.
According to the official instructions given by Douban, it can be understood that Douban's investigation of the character played by Zhao Liying in "Who is the Murderer" was evaluated in advance when he did not appear, and removed 244 illegal short comments, and cleared 3209 abnormal ratings before the opening of the score.
Among the irregular ratings that were processed before the opening of "Who is the Murderer" were 935 five-star ratings, 1082 one-star ratings, and 1506 short reviews involving personal attacks, unwatched episodes, that is, ratings, etc., that are not related to the content of the episodes. In other words, the data of the one-star abnormal rating in "Who is the Murderer" is more than the five-star abnormal rating.
In addition, in response to the situation that the "Wind Rises Luoyang" episode is not online and the score is scored, the Douban official also gave an official explanation. There were 21,234 abnormal ratings that were processed before the opening of "Wind Rises in Luoyang", including 12,366 five-star ratings, 6,610 one-star ratings, and 2,506 short comments that involved personal attacks, unwatched episodes, that is, ratings, and other unrelated episode content.
It is worth mentioning that the official instructions released by Douban specifically stated the time period when the episode was not broadcast from 20:00 to 21:00 on December 1, and there were 6752 five-star ratings under the entry, and 649 one-star ratings appeared in the concentration.
From the official instructions released by Douban, it can be understood that on the day of the premiere of "Wind Rises Luoyang", when the episode was not broadcast, the number of five-star ratings that appeared in the douban entry was more than 10 times the number of one-star ratings that appeared in the concentration.
In addition, among the abnormal ratings that were processed before the opening of the score of "Wind Rise Luoyang", the five-star abnormal score was also more than 2 times the one-star abnormal score. It seems that the "fans" in this tug-of-war are obviously the winning side.
In addition to the explanation of the suspected accusations of "Wind Rising Luoyang" and "Who is the Murderer", Douban also reiterated its principles and original intentions in the statement, with sincere words and sincerity.
It can only be said that the credibility of the Douban score has declined, in fact, it cannot be completely blamed on Douban, after all, those works with unfair ratings are mostly works in which traffic actors participate.
Of course, Douban has been attacked at present, only short reviews, after all, this is the easiest to operate by the water army, but the long reviews of Douban are still credible, and there are many senior film critics here.
For ordinary audiences, a film and television work is good or bad, it is a matter of opinion, some people like advanced plots, some people also like to decompress nonsense, some people like to make good special effects, and some people like sand sculpture fifty cent special effects.
Everyone's purpose of chasing dramas and watching movies is different, and the perception and rating of film and television works are naturally different. The existence of Douban can only be said to serve a certain part of the group, and the statement of credibility is actually illusory, and turnips and greens have their own love.