laitimes

Mobile phone and you want to use removable battery really out of you will buy?

Last week, after refuting the views of a mobile phone editor on this site, I launched the "Mobile phone is no longer integrated, and then return to dismantling the battery?" Isn't that a fuss! Article, and then its mobile phone editor launched a "mobile phone back to the removable battery is only a matter of time" to play with me, I personally said that I do not understand several points of the article, this article continues to state my point of view, see who is ridiculous?

Mobile phone and you want to use removable battery really out of you will buy?

01 Take a look at the real comments of netizens below your previous article

Mobile phone and you want to use removable battery really out of you will buy?

The eyes of the masses are shining

Mobile phone and you want to use removable battery really out of you will buy?

I'll just look, don't talk, and open up below.

02 Back to the removable battery Really have to struggle with the problem of charging?

Mobile phone and you want to use removable battery really out of you will buy?

The above is an editor refuting my interception of the article, and I have a few questions to ask him:

1, do you have obsessive-compulsive disorder, get up in the morning to charge the phone from 0% to 100%, wait 20 minutes, and then go out? I may charge my phone to 20% for 5 minutes, which is enough for me to commute from home to work, unless your company runs out of power.

2, I admit that charging 5 minutes is not as fast as you cut off the battery and then install it up, but if you drink too much last night, you don't know where to put the spare battery, and finally find 20 minutes, or simply lose it, it is better to charge 5 minutes of electricity steadily, right?

3, "charging for 5 minutes, talking for two hours", yes, how classic, why is OPPO successful? Do you still dare to underestimate fast charging?

03 Reasons for Non-Removable Batteries You were wrong in the first place!

At the beginning of the article that the "Druid" refuted me, he claimed that 2007 was the "Jobs era", and claimed that the world's first smartphone with a non-removable battery was the iPhone, and talked about the "sense of design", saying that the multiple smartphones that were subsequently listed blocked the LOGO exactly the same.

The following are the points that I refute or correct, and ask this "wild" student to study with an open mind:

1, I think, the world's first non-removable battery, that is, integrated smartphone, is not an iPhone, but an IBM Simon mobile phone, from 1994. Although the final sales generally did not "change the world" like the iPhone, if you talk about the non-removable battery, it is indeed wrong to say that the iPhone is the first one, and users can consult the information about IBM's smartphone by themselves, and will not repeat it too much here.

Mobile phone and you want to use removable battery really out of you will buy?

2. The "Jobs era" you called is a word you made up yourself, right?

Jobs left this world forever two days after the iPhone 4s conference, and the third-generation iPhone, that is, the iPhone 3GS, was only introduced to China in late 2009, and the official opening of the country was the iPhone 4. And Jobs died at the end of 2011, from the domestic market, is the "era" you call only 2 years?

3, non-removable batteries to promote the industry to the next decade

The integrated fuselage, the large screen without physical buttons, is the most critical progress of the smart phone, and the non-removable battery plays a role in carrying up and down.

04 it is really not that mobile phone manufacturers are following the trend, but this era has arrived!

Secondly, the editor who refuted my mobile phone said in the article: "After the Jobs era, mobile phone manufacturers across the country and even the world are following the trend."

Mobile phone and you want to use removable battery really out of you will buy?

Advances in the industry are pushing mobile phones to the next stage of the era

For "following the trend" and "imitating" Apple, I dare not agree with this:

1, due to the progress of the industry, prompting major mobile phone brands to be listed and developed without physical buttons touch large-screen smart phones, and because of this, after continuous progress, there has been the rise of many domestic mobile phone brands such as vivo, millet, OPPO, one plus, Huawei, etc., the solutions of downstream factories are becoming more and more perfect, the screen, camera, chip, software and other fields continue to improve, the initial Android machine is also doing more and more characteristics, even in a sense more than Apple.

2, and to achieve an integrated fuselage, in addition to changing the use of mobile phones, thin and light has once again become the main point of force in the mobile phone industry, who holds a mobile phone will be like the original "big brother", so the first problem to be solved is the non-removable battery, the integrated fuselage is actually more intense, and it can also do a more beautiful appearance.

05 Finally, I asked the soul of a mobile phone editor

You're a guy with the iPhone 13 Pro Max and MacBook, would you really buy a phone with a removable battery? I don't think so.

Mobile phone manufacturers are not stupid, I think there will be no more so-called removable battery mobile phones in the industry in 5 years or even 10 years, or what is a module, modular mobile phones, unless the mobile phone has been replaced by VR or what meta-universe, the mobile phone has returned to the original "call + texting" function used.

(7829054)

Read on