Recently, one of the most common words used to talk about Relations between China is subversive. Obviously, this subversiveness comes from the United States playing the "Taiwan card" and has "driven to the edge of the cliff". In fact, the whole world is paying attention to Sino-US relations, and senior US military officials have also made it clear that sino-US war will be disastrous, and AMERICAN scholars say that once China and the United States misjudge conflicts in the Taiwan Strait, Taiwan will become ashes. But what we have to think about is, where is this subversive tipping point in Sino-US relations?
Now that the United States has fully revealed its true colors, its relations with Taiwan are really close and close, to be described as "rock solid." It can be seen that they are really a group, and recently they have joined forces to carry out many conspiracies, and they do not even intend to keep the mainland Chinese people in the dark, and Tsai Ing-wen has publicly announced that the US military has been stationed in Taiwan. Is this the hegemonic authorities' public declaration that their support for Taiwan is "rock solid"? Just a few dozen American soldiers, running to Taiwan can be as solid as a rock?
However, under such circumstances, there are still a small number of Chinese who continue to hold illusions about the United States and Sino-US relations. However, it is understood that people are the mainstream, and most of China has seen very clearly that hegemony is destined to use the Taiwan issue to coerce and strike China in the future, and that China and the United States will have storms around the Taiwan issue in the future, and contradictions and conflicts will be higher than a wave. This has become an established conspiracy for hegemony and the greatest scourge in the Taiwan Strait.
At present, a conspicuous issue in front of us is the stationing of the US military in Taiwan; judging from its nature, this problem is very acute and will become more and more intense in the future, and it is very likely that there will be a subversive tipping point between China and the United States, that is, a flashpoint of direct conflict. In this regard, the following issues deserve serious discussion.
The United States recognizes that there is only one China on both sides of the Taiwan Strait and recognizes That Taiwan is a part of China. In this case, can American soldiers enter the territory of other countries without the permission of the Chinese government? Even if the United States recognizes the legitimacy of the Taiwan authorities, the Taiwan authorities are not the Chinese government after all. An analogy might be made to this, if the Hawaii state government invites Chinese troops to enter Hawaii, can Chinese troops be stationed? Is this a military invasion?
From the standpoint of the Chinese people and the Chinese Government, the us sending troops to Taiwan is a naked act of aggression. This has always been the case, when MacArthur sent troops into Taiwan, the Chinese people regarded it as aggression, and later the US-Taiwan Mutual Defense Agreement, the Chinese government still characterized it as aggression, which is completely correct and in line with basic political logic, and is also a human axiom. Now the United States has once again sent troops to Taiwan, which is an act of military aggression in the first instance.
Others have invaded the territory of China's sacred treasure island, should China launch a counterattack?
I think that there are two problems that must be clearly distinguished, one is the logical distinction between "can't" and "whether it should be". "Whether or not" is a matter of principle concerning attitude and position; whether or not there is a corresponding ability is a question of strength level; some people deliberately confuse these two issues and deliberately make up paste on this issue in order to dispel the righteous indignation and patriotism of the Chinese people; second, the difference between specific means and methods. There are many means and ways to counterattack and counter the US military stationed in Taiwan, the specific options depend on the corresponding conditions and background situation, the basic principle is to choose the most favorable way for China, not necessarily immediately resort to force, but must not give up the inherent right to resort to force, if anyone at this time is still talking about what can only be resolved peacefully and can not use other methods, then naturally they will be scolded.
The Taiwan issue originally belonged to China's internal affairs, and the United States did not have any power to interfere arbitrarily, but in today's situation, the Taiwan issue seems to have become a sino-US issue and one of the issues in Sino-US relations.
In this way, the Taiwan issue has a dangerous tendency to internationalize, and the hegemonic wishful thinking is to push the Taiwan issue in this direction, make it evolve and ferment into an international issue, and engulf more countries to participate in it, so as to further isolate and attack China.
This is a very dangerous tendency, which also means that China's strategic pressure on the Taiwan issue will become greater and greater in the future, not less and less.
Just as a drop of water reflects the light of the sun, the Taiwan issue is like a mirror that illuminates the true face of Sino-US relations. Sadly, some "experts" and "scholars" have done their best to instill in the Chinese how great and how great the hegemonic United States is; they regard the hegemonic rulers as good people, regard the American rulers as intimate girlfriends, regard hegemony as a temple, and portray American society as a paradise on earth.
In fact, hegemony is the most vicious enemy of the Chinese people, and when such propaganda can be openly publicized, when Sino-US relations will step onto a new level and enter a new realm.
Note: The author of this article is Zhang Zhikun, a core member of the "Qin'an Strategic Think Tank", which is the original work of this platform, welcome to indicate the source of reprinting, reprinting is an important way to gather network strength.