On November 1, Zhang Huaping, an associate professor at Beijing Institute of Technology, posted an angry article on Weibo: Chen Mou, a graduate student of a 985 university, copied 100% of the master's thesis of Zhao Lianwei, a graduate student he brought, which was simply a "shame for researchers". The blog post is also accompanied by relevant instructions provided by Zhao Lianwei.
Associate Professor Zhang Huaping in his own certification blog post attached his 2016 master's student Zhao Lianwei to report his own paper - "News Abbreviations for New Media Key Technology Research" was almost 100% plagiarized relevant instructions, according to this Zhao student said that his thesis was under the guidance of Zhang Huaping teacher, in January 2016 defense passed, in CNKI can search for the publication time of his paper on January 1, 2016, and the plagiarist Chen Mou's paper in addition to the slight difference in acknowledgements and keywords, The full text is 100% plagiarized from the format to the content, and the publication date of CNKI is November 28, 2016, which is obviously later than the paper he published.
The funny thing is that the plagiarist Chen Mou wrote in the acknowledgment section that this thesis was completed under the careful guidance of Teacher Tang Moumou. From the initial topic selection, to the discussion and determination of the intermediate solution, and then to the design and implementation of the final experimental stage, Teacher Tang Moumou spent a lot of energy and put forward valuable opinions.
Now that the "East Window Incident" occurred, Chen was identified as "plagiarism" by the school degree evaluation committee of the school where he graduated, and a decision was made to revoke Chen's master's degree, and his tutor was also disqualified from tutoring due to missing checks.
Zhang Huaping, an associate professor at Beijing Institute of Technology, posted thanking the university for its impartial handling, while angrily criticizing the plagiarist Chen Mou as a graduate student of a 985 university, which is simply a "shame for researchers".
In the face of this matter, netizens have said: the paper from the structure to the content of 100% plagiarism, this is really bold, this three years of white learning does not say, but also involved the tutor, smear the school.
As we all know, since the "Zhai Tianlin Incident", most of the ordinary journals with undergraduate papers have been controlled within 30%; while the repetition rate of master's and doctoral papers and core journals has mostly been controlled within 10%-15%, and the re-examination rate of doctoral dissertations in some universities is even as high as 5%. In order to make their papers meet the requirements of re-checking, students generally have to repeatedly check and revise until they are qualified, and how do papers like Chen Mou, which are 100% plagiarized from the structure to the content, be checked and published through CNKI? This has caused many netizens to wonder: how did Chen mou do it?
Netizens analysis: students should use the official website of CNKI to check before publishing papers, if Chen's paper 100% plagiarizes Zhao's published paper, then this kind of paper can not pass the review, let alone appear on CNKI at the same time.
Even if the students do not use CNKI to check the weight, the school's review and check system should also make an objective judgment, and then Chen graduated from the university or 985 college, such a level of colleges and universities can not have a double check system, like Chen Mou plagiarism so high thesis should not pass the preliminary review, how can it be finally published in a dignified manner, which is really incredible.
Some netizens boldly speculated: whether it will be a sale and purchase of papers, or the paper has been stolen before it is published and then sold to Chen, and the reason why Chen did not check it at that time may be because Zhao's paper has not been published.
This conjecture has been supported by some netizens, who believe that normal people's thinking can not be copied in full, from the two papers published in the same year, it is possible that Chen bought the gunman's paper, and then did not check the well-known official website to check the order, of course, it may also be that Zhao's paper was sold after being leaked.
In short, whether it is plagiarism or buying a thesis, Chen was eventually reported for plagiarism and revoked his master's degree qualifications, which is the punishment he deserves, and the tragic price paid by Chen will also warn all graduate students in school, must do good research, write papers well, do not plagiarize or take shortcuts, otherwise in the end, not only will their future be ruined, but also may involve the tutor, this kind of harmful thing must not be done again.
For the matter of "a 985 college student who plagiarized 100% of the thesis was revoked from the master's degree, and the tutor was disqualified as a tutor", what do you think, welcome to leave a message to communicate.
Transferred from: Fingertip Education Empire