South Korea's gender antagonism is the highest in the world, and if Japan relies on Buddhism to lie flat and soft, then South Korea is a gender war of political correctness.
Korean female player
At the Olympic Games some time ago, many people should remember that there was a news that the female athlete who won the archery gold medal, because the short hair was considered to be a feminist was asked to return the gold medal by the online newspaper.
Many people think it is incredible, why can Korean men be so devilish, and actually fight the Olympic champion for the country? But if you pay attention to the speech, you will find that a more interesting thing is that the reason for the male netizen internet violence is that he is a feminist, and all the people who defend him are defending him in the direction of not feminism. I found that no, both men and women will not argue about whether women's rights are good or not, but are arguing whether he is women's rights or not.
Why is that? Why has feminism become such a word in South Korea that it does not want to be labeled? The answer also begins more than a decade ago.
Like Japan, both men and women in South Korea have had a good full moon, and along with economic development, urbanization, fashion avant-garde, and free love ideas have spread widely among young people. At the beginning of the century, the young men and women of The Four Asian Tigers in Korea also had a common beautiful vision, and Korean feminism was also at this time.
Appeared at this time, their appeal is also a delicate independent women's thinking, advocating individualism and past traditions to do cutting, and the same Korean feminism once also received the support of most people regardless of men and women, but the same plot as Japan appeared, since the rise of China in the new century continues to challenge south Korea's pillar industries, the situation of internal volumes appears in large numbers, the economic crisis in 2008 is even worse, the unemployment rate is bursting, the inner volume began to appear on a large scale, the plot behind ah, you should be able to guess, Under the battle royale, Korean men and women began to roll each other, and like Japan, Korean women also lost in the battle royale. But what is more serious than japan is that extreme feminism on the South Korean side has prevailed, and the Meglia organization has emerged.
Meglia is a radical feminist organization that emerged in 2015 and, at first, actually gathered together to oppose sexual harassment, anti-employment discrimination, and make all kinds of demeaning remarks about men, but then became more and more radical to promote the promotion of abortion of baby boys, insisting on the complete sex genocide of South Korea's male propaganda to take knives to the streets to stab strange men, take selfies on the neck of sleeping fathers with knives, and even national heroes. Also attacked because of male identity.
In a sense, in terms of radicalism, Korean feminism is the most radical in the world, whether it is China, Japan or Europe and the United States, it is incomparable. All the gender-antagonistic rhetoric and related cases that you see today are not a problem in South Korea. But the problem is that the direction of radical feminism in South Korea makes the same mistake, their power is not aimed at the capitalists, but at the men who are also proletarians, and there is a ready-made capitalist who does not fight, but wants to attack the imaginary patriarchal void, attacking ordinary men, and the result? Naturally, the Korean male power began to fight back, and the more they fought, the more radical, and their thinking was more extreme than the Japanese lying flat, and it was the idea of using magic to defeat the correct confrontation of magic politics.
What does that mean? There are more men than women in one photo, and South Korean feminists say that this is discrimination against women and social oppression of women. The average person's train of thought is to explain the specific situation, not to discriminate against women, right? When the idea of the Korean male group is, yes, this is discrimination against women, your website should all be removed from the shelves to apologize, but if you change the picture more women than men, that is discrimination against men. Come on, we count each photo one by one. The number of men and women, but where it is not the same, your website is unlucky, in short, with political correctness to fight political correctness, you want to be fair, I will give you fairness, and more than you think 10,000 times fairer, if there is a little unfairness that is discrimination, see who can not stand it first, equality between men and women OK, I completely agree, so eat to pay, you have to feel that men should pay a little more, then you are engaged in discrimination,
Variety shows can't make jokes about women, no problem, then variety shows can't joke with men, right? You wouldn't be against equality between men and women, would you? And when both sides are holding a magnifying glass to watch the variety show, when the variety show producer gets autism, the woman is surprised to find that this model is a loss, why? Because of political correctness, variety shows are basically impossible to do in a booming atmosphere, and women find themselves able to see less content, while men do? Men don't watch variety shows.
Another example is that women accuse men of texting harassment, saying that Korean men are really disgusting, so all the opposite sexes are not allowed to text each other, which has appeared the legendary courtship three times to count the crime regulations, and then, interesting to come, at the beginning, women also think that this regulation is a way of earning, so women so both sides. Pushing for implementation together, but soon more and more women reacted, the beneficiaries of this regulation are men, because the regulation is equivalent to directly killing the existence space of licking dogs, and women have lost the romantic and bargaining space in love. Simply put, South Korea has also encountered the same situation as us, and men are reluctant to pull down their faces to pursue women. The emergence of this regulation gives men an excuse to leave as soon as they are rejected.
Chasing girls what to chase, up is you are not in the middle, you do not promise me to go directly to the house do not ask is that I respect women will never commit crimes, so trouble within three times Ah you give a number. So many women began to oppose, they think that ah three times too little, lost love, romance can not judge each other to cherish, but the Korean male power immediately hit you against you against you think about the feelings of being harassed women? So the magical scene appeared, women's rights seized political correctness and said that men cannot be given opportunities, and many women in turn support more opportunities for men. This style of play also directly tears apart Korean women, because no matter what level of men want to chase girls in the process, save some trouble, everyone does not kneel and lick, everyone saves trouble.
For women, the problem of top women is that they are harassed every day, and invitations are too busy. The problem for ordinary women is that men are not sincere enough to be proactive, and there are fundamental differences between the two sides on this issue. South Korean male power found that the overall victory of the original men at the wedding was so easy to be consistent, so he immediately hit the iron while it was hot and chased after the victory. At that time, the focus of the topic of Women's Rights in South Korea was also in marriage, such as accusing marriage of oppression of women, and some criticizing the cooling off period of divorce, etc., and there was also a cooling off period for divorce in South Korea, but they called the divorce consideration period, and then, interestingly, the anti-fight idea of Korean male rights is that you actually want to improve this, and you really still want to get married. Marriage is the oppression of women, and I fully approve of it, so why do you always think of improving this to make women into the pit? In simple terms, Korean male rights have turned this topic into a magic contest for who does not want to get married. This time, Korean feminists think that they must have won, because everyone has always known that women, men who need marriage are more eager to get married, so there is a saying that men should pay in love and need to give up benefits, but when the curtain is finally revealed. Women are surprised to find that they have lost a large number of Korean men who really do not want to get married. Why is that? In fact, just by looking at the case of Japan and the economic logic behind it, you can fully understand the situation in South Korea. The economic base determines the superstructure, and like Japan, in the environment of gender confrontation in the economic downturn, Korean men suddenly find themselves stronger, and it is more beneficial to themselves to be single and not married. At this time, the only reason for marriage is from the traditional pressure of parents, and feminism just breaks the traditional order and responsibility constraints. South Korean feminists accused men of not being gentle and considerate enough, and Korean men immediately broke up quickly, don't be oppressed. Korean feminist blames the current male is not masculine, Korean male power is immediately fantastic, do not open champagne to celebrate, anyway, you will not marry him, right? Everyone doesn't want to get married, why do you talk so much nonsense? Could it be that you want to get married? Oh my God, you actually want women to be oppressed by marriage, don't give advice to men, don't have the illusion of being able to live, everyone has been separated, who wants to get married is dog. When the South Korean male power really threw away the mask, it meant that everyone should withdraw. When they were completely separated, Korean feminists found that almost all of their footholds were mentioned, and the space was all destroyed, and you picked a bunch of thorns for the marriage and told the other party to change these, otherwise they would never get married. Then the other party replied, why do you think I want to get married? Many people can't understand why Korean men and women are so abrasive and extreme. In fact, they all did not understand the situation, and the two of them were actually engaged in a magic contest involving the right to speak. In this kind of situation where both parties are extreme to the point of being devilish, who does not want to get married more, who has more confidence to ask for it, who really needs marriage more? Who really needs each other's cooperation more? Whoever can't hold faster loses. Then the Korean feminist found that the Joker was actually herself. The economic base determines the superstructure, and South Korean feminists want to fight, but the female group behind them really can't go on. South Korea's demonic gender antagonism has shattered the alliance of young men and women, Korean men find themselves able to complete a single win with capital, women in the workplace mostly represent women, and excellent men want to criticize men who are less women in the workplace, women are oppressed by male society. Since we are all going to be criticized, we might as well choose the latter, because then we are. There are more positions, and when the other party wants to accuse you of gender oppression anyway, you better really oppress you on gender. Under this line of thinking, South Korean male power directly imitates the finalists in Japan, opens the real wireless internal selection mode of not marrying or falling in love, and Korean women are directly swept up and cannot play, but the question is, what if it is limited to this?
South Korea can not yet be called a gender war, more serious is yet to come. In 2018, 11 39-year-old business owners were accused of sexual harassment while eating at a Korean restaurant, and a woman lacked evidence of the incident other than the victim's testimony, but in the end the man was sentenced to six months in prison. This incident is a sign that it has completely aroused the voice of the Korean male group against women's rights. Later, when polling agency Ric Mater surveyed, more than 76% of young South Korean men expressed opposition to feminism, of which more than 65% of men said that they equated feminism with hatred of men, and even 56.5% said that if their girlfriend was a feminist, they would immediately break up with him. They argue that feminism is no longer simply a claim for gender equality, but has evolved into a form of sexism and hatred that has erupted from the lost movement. It is more obvious to note that this time it is not the extreme male view of South Korea, but the public view of male passers-by. That is to say, you think that The Korean male power is very abrasive, but the reality is that the more they fight, the stronger they are, the larger the group. Then a phenomenon that broke everyone's glasses appeared.
In the April 2021 Seoul mayoral by-election, 72.5 percent of young men voted for conservatives, even higher than male voters over the age of 60. In 2017, 90 percent of this group was pro-liberal. Many people may not understand what this means. To put it simply, no matter what country, young men in the age group of 20 to 30 have no family pressure, no life pressure, and should be the most avant-garde and innovative force in a society, a variety of new technologies and new products, the recipients and backbone of new ideas. Then such a core cornerstone group of the left not only did not throw in the left, but also voted for the conservatives in the opposite direction, and was more completely conservative than the 60-year-old, and the direct result was that the liberals exploded and the conservatives took off. Because of the conservative anti-feminist conservative Lee Joon-hee, his famous remark is that radical feminism is as toxic as terrorism. Do you feel like saying this after that. Should I resign or should I apologize to women? No, none. With a staunch anti-feminist attitude, he was elected to the party with a lack of financial support, factional support or regional support, with a support rate of 43.82%, becoming the youngest major political party leader in South Korea after democratization.
President Moon Jae-in, on the other hand, who calls himself a feminist, promised to make up half of his cabinet as women in the 2017 election, but the problem is that he didn't live up to what he once promised. The more fatal problem is that his silence while his subordinate, Penny Rabbit, directly led to the loss of support from female voters, with the end result being that the current one-party support rate overwhelms Moon Jae-in.
So I say that the gender antagonisms in other countries are smaller than those in South Korea, and south Korea is really a gender war that can reach the 20-year-old young people running to the conservatives, who can not say a word of admiration?
After understanding this, you may understand why the Korean feminist rights eventually collapsed into a word that everyone should avoid. As a political trend of thought, they have never thought about what their demands are, where the boundaries are, and they have not thought about who is their friend and who is their enemy.
If you want to be fair in the workplace and oppose discrimination in the workplace, then you should be systematic. The proletarian league is aimed at the capitalists, but they aim their guns at other proletariats, and men oppose sexual harassment, so order should be emphasized against criminals. But what about them? The gunfire was aimed at all Korean men, all of whom were criminals, and the South Korean male power was more mature and determined in this competition. First of all, from beginning to end, the core demands of the extreme feminist groups have been demonized, and the magic has seized the politically correct high ground.
A lot of feminist topics in South Korea seem to be against marriage, but what about the essence? In fact, it is to raise the price, how to optimize the marriage. South Korean male power after forming a consensus on who is married and who is a dog, completely suppressed the power point of feminism, and secondly, Korean men firmly grasped the principle that the economic foundation is the cornerstone of everything, grasped the productive forces from beginning to end, and cooperated with capital to launch the ultimate inner volume directly to the women can not play. In the end, the young men of Tang Guo collectively put down their grades and ran to the conservatives. Any country, the traditional conservative forces, the capital forces, the main ethnic groups, and the males, are basically the pillar forces of mutual checks and balances, but after a mess of Korean feminism, these three forces actually sat on a table. This unimaginative anti-feminist united front was established when south Korean feminism collapsed. It's unavoidable.
In terms of the basic disk, Korean feminists have made the same mistakes as Japanese feminism, in addition to being able to scold people loudly, they have not won real benefits for their own women from beginning to end, but Korean men have gained more after breaking away from the shackles of tradition. South Korean female Xuan found after a long-term gender confrontation that according to this set of korean feminist play methods, to avoid male gains, women are even less flattering, do not fight all men to punch, men are more powerful, then what else do I fight? At this point, Korean women have also begun to oppose women's rights, or against this theoretical mechanism. In fact, China has also begun to have this sign, more and more women said that although the previous generation of machismo, but the good villains have a sense of responsibility to make money to support the family, now one by one lying flat to eat soft rice, meeting is a money is not given, a return to the loss. But it's been 30 years since Japan put on the brakes again under the same widespread hatred and antagonism.
The gender war, Japan and South Korea have ended in a chicken feather. Looking at the lessons learned from Japan and South Korea, we can find a lot of things, first of all, the differences between men and women are very obvious, and the overall requirements of women are more diversified, some hope that men will have money, and some hope that men will have the hope of research friends. Men are gentle, and some really feel that they are living alone. Under the banner of japanese and Korean feminism, women's demands are actually very, very scattered, and the only consensus is that like men exert pressure, they feel that men are not good enough and want to improve, but the specific hope that men will improve in which area, in fact, there is no unity, and even often the top level of nurses. Women want to be equal in the workplace, economic equality, the bottom of the women may be more willing to make money to support the family, both sides themselves, even can fight, in a sense and boxing evolution, and finally embark on the route of hatred of men, not accidentally, because the only common denominator of each female group is dissatisfaction with men, and almost all classes of men, regardless of wealth, regardless of age, the appeal to women is young and beautiful, so on the male side, the common interests are more clear, and it is easier to form a solid united front. Reflected in reality, that is, women's empathy ability is stronger, often able to form an organization first, but after the first wave of fighting, the appeal is scattered, often can not find the key direction, and began to fight around.
If you look at the female trend of thought, you will find that there is a rush to everything, that is, there is no core program for what men want to do. Once men are united, the overall appeal is more clear, and they can implement the overall appeal very resolutely, even if it is extremely grinding. Only in Japan can there be such a group of men in Japan who do not enter the factory even if they lie flat, and prefer not to drag women to death indiscriminately.
Extreme feminism is early, extreme male power is strong, and the first wave of feminism will often be dragged to death by male power in a tug-of-war. Secondly, we should note that under the overall gender war, the most won is actually the individual men who are good at absorbing each other's theories, whether it is Japan or South Korea, the final winners are the men who have learned the theory of feminism, do not marry and are not responsible for all financial resources, they completely implement exquisite egoism, and laugh to the end.
On the women's side, the ultimate winner also happens to be the group of women who have truly implemented gender equality and resolutely oppose special treatment. To put it simply, don't let the curse of the times become your own, you must grasp the productive forces and economic foundation at all times, and never become a person who can do nothing but complain about this hatred.
Finally, we should also note that the 30-year gender war looks vigorous, but in the end, whether it is Japan or South Korea, the Western feminist trend has not solved the problem of women's rights and interests, but has become a problem that tears apart society. So why don't we think that the feminist trend in the West can solve the problem of women in China, the reason for the collapse of feminism in Japan and South Korea is that they only grasp the political correctness and consumption rights of public opinion, but they do not grasp the productive forces and economic foundation, and finally lose the protracted war against each other. This shows that any trend of thought that blows wildly will eventually have to be tested by the productive forces and the material basis.
China's women's rights and interests are the result of the corresponding superstructure and adaptive changes after the development of productive forces has led to changes in the economic base of women, rather than the result of the slogans shouted out in the air. This is a victory for seeking truth from facts, and it is also a victory for following the philosophical values of Marx's theory. President Zhang Guimei and Comrade Shen Jilan have already made the best demonstration for everyone. Finally, given the length of the article, what is the core issue of feminist theory? How to get rid of its dross and take its essence?