Talk about things with concessions

The story of Kong Rong's pear has been passed down for thousands of years, and people are deeply touched by the spirit of a four-year-old baby, which is really worthy of being a moral model. Therefore, whether at school or at home, teachers and parents usually educate children with the story of Kong Rong Jean Pear, hoping that he can become a moral person.

When I saw that someone in the subway seemed to be less than forty years old and refused to give up his seat to the old man, just by virtue of my little temper, I knew that someone must have wanted to go over and strongly condemn him with the story of the four-year-old Meng Bao, but when he approached, he found that he was already asleep.

Things in the subway are hypothetical objective existences. Therefore, I did not dare to call myself a Taoist and subjectively looked at the problem from the perspective of "nothingness".

First, sitting, can get up to condemn others, why can't you give up your seat to the old man?

1, is an old man (or pregnant women and children and other people who need to be given up), will be heart to heart.

2, not an old man (or not a pregnant woman and child and other people who need to be given up), can get up to condemn but do not give up, no heart.

Second, is it the one who is standing, or is it standing after letting it go?

1, the original standing, this situation, standing and talking without waist pain is not pejorative, because there is a reason to condemn people who do not give up their seats, so the standing waist is not only not painful and rational, do not use the waist, with heart.

2, let the end of the standing, this situation, there has been a humble concession before, and then to condemn the people who do not give up the seat, words and deeds, have a heart.

Third, whether sitting or standing, after finding that the person who does not let the seat fall asleep?

1, do not condemn, from the position of the sleeping man can understand him, not only do not condemn him, but also sympathize with him, have a heart.

2, condemnation, can fall asleep in such a noisy environment in the subway, indicating that he is really tired, if the person who is asleep is you, can you bear to condemn him? Centerless.

To sum up, there are condemning people, there are people who follow the condemnation and condemn, there are people who do not condemn, there are people who follow the non-condemnation and do not condemn, people have objectively existed in the hypothetical scene.

So, what is the relationship between giving way and the object must be reversed?

Here's the problem, that's philosophy. Philosophy needs dialectics, and the opposite of things must be dialectical relations. From the heart to the heartless, from the heart to the heart, and then from the heart to the heartless, this is to explain the relationship between the seat and the object must be reversed.

The impression given by Taoism, in the words of the past and the present, is a bit bizarre. People usually look at things from the standpoint of what is there and pay attention to what is visible. Taoists, on the other hand, usually look at things from the standpoint of "nothingness" and pay more attention to the invisible of nothingness.

If the law has no use, it can clearly see the facts of the crime; if the soldiers have no use, they can clearly define the strategy of subduing the enemy.

Just like sandbox deduction, standing in the perspective of "God" and looking at the whole situation, this is actually standing in the position of "nothing". For the real battlefield, the sandbox deduction is the void space.

Some people say, "I can't think of anything, what is the connection between giving way, sand table deduction, void space and the extreme opposite of things?" These four are not the same thing at all, and have nothing to do with each other. ”

Yes, from the standpoint of existence, the four have nothing to do with each other. And from the position of "nothing", it is not only unrelated, it is simply a major correlation.

Like a cold, cell phone, chemistry, water, do they seem to have a relationship?

The answer is yes. Radiation from mobile phones can affect health, and industrial wastewater can contaminate drinking water. Seemingly unrelated, there is a fatal causal relationship.

"After his body and his body first, outside his body and his body, it is not selfless, so it can become selfish." This is exactly how Lao Tzu looked at things.