The second and third children have been opened up one after another, but people's response has been flat.
Compared with the second child, after the opening of the third child, people's reverse psychology is stronger, and for the birth of the third child, everyone's interest has fallen to the bottom, when the two-child policy is open, although people are resistant at the beginning, but from the current two-child data, it is still successful.
And the two-child families that can be seen everywhere now confirm that many people have slowly begun to accept the second child, but since the opening of the three-child policy, in order to encourage people to have a stronger willingness to have a baby, they have been making changes.
But no matter how it changes? For the matter of having three children, everyone can still only look at the attitude of not blaspheming from a distance, and some people have been confusing the public under the banner of killing and not having a second child or a third child.
And the reason they give is indeed convincing to many young people, that is, they can't afford to raise a second and third child, and it is too expensive to raise a child now, or raising a baby is easy to reduce their quality of life.
And because many people did listen to their arguments and were gradually brainwashed, so there are even fewer people who have three children now.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="9" > "kill and not have two or three children", most of these exquisite self-interested people are from one-child families</h1>
Looking at the increasing number of people who have killed and not had two or three children, people can't help but want to investigate what the truest thoughts of these people are in their hearts. What are their most needed needs?
Watching the country continue to make concessions and continuously improve the three-child policy, it ensures that everyone has a baby from all aspects without reducing the quality of life to help us and stimulate the desire to have children.
From the beginning of the double eyelids to the current fertility, cash, dividends and subsidies, step by step closer to our needs, but these people who are killed and do not have a second child, the third child can never say what they need to have a baby.
Therefore, for these people, everyone has a new label, that is, exquisite egoism, and after investigation, most of these people are from one-child families.
In this way, there is nothing particularly strange, because the one-child family cultivates exquisite egoists, which is actually expected, but they themselves are not very clear, and the impact on children is not good.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="39" >What is a refined egoist? </h1>
In fact, exquisite egoism, as early as 2012, Professor Qian Liqun of Peking University said at a symposium at Wuhan University:
"Exquisite egoists, their high intelligence is worldly enough to be good at performing, know how to cooperate, and are better at using the system to achieve their own goals, and if these people hold power, then they will inevitably become corrupt officials"
The so-called refinement actually means that they have a high IQ and upbringing, and everything they do is legitimate and impeccable on the surface, that is, close to perfect such a person.
And such people, at the same time, they are also very selfish, unscrupulous people in order to achieve their own ends.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="41" > one-child families are most likely to raise refined egoists</h1>
A child who is loved by thousands of people is a typical exquisite egoist
Why many families don't want a second or third child, they mainly think that they should give all their love to the same child, rather than dispersing, then, when the whole family gives their love to this child for a lifetime.
Children themselves can also feel the feeling of being valued and surrounded by love, so at this time children are more likely to become selfish, and they will become more and more unable to accept having younger siblings or older siblings.
Therefore, the words exquisite egoism are a good description of the only child, and this wayward psychology or attitude and personality will become more and more self-interested with age. More and more selfish, so when they are old, they will not be able to accept having a second or third child.
It has become the norm for only children not to think of others
First of all, as a parent, the child must be 100% unconditional and unrewarded, then the child in the family is easier to pay attention to and love, and at this time, the child also becomes ignoring the views of the people around him because he has gained a full sense of security and love.
In their dictionary, there is no sharing or tolerance, and even, of course, not for anyone's sake, and because of this concept, it makes them even more unacceptable, because of the matter of having a child to lower their own standard of living.
So let alone let them have a second or third child, let them have a child is already a better performance of family education.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="42" > Ball's mother:</h1>
The educational model of one-child families is indeed very different from that of two-child families or three-child families, and when all our focus and energy are all focused on one child, everything that children feel is completely different.
Therefore, in different environments, children who grow up under different educations, the events and scales that they can accept and tolerate are also different, and the one-child families are indeed more tolerant, tolerant and doting on the education of their children.
Obviously, such a relationship ultimately achieves the child's selfishness, and also makes the child unable to accept more and broader character.
Today's Topic:
Do you think that the only child represents exquisite egoism, absolutely? Welcome to leave a message at the bottom of the screen!