This is not only a documentary, but also a must-have film for speculators. "Yukio Mishima vs Todaiquan Fight" is in a bland way, from another point of view, blandly saying that both are right, and empathy deserves respect.
This is just a realization many years later, under the pressure of the time, it is difficult to give such a judgment, a debate of a thousand people, a documentary restores the scene of the year, and the relevant personnel.
After many years, looking back at the problems of that year again is like looking back at the mistakes of childhood. Different moods and states, summed up feelings are the real state of mind.
In 1960, there were various problems, and the spark of social movements and idealism made many people feel that history had ushered in a turning point. Those years fascinated many people, even if some of the words were difficult to understand, and even the sense of picture was very poor, but things in sharp turns always caught people off guard.
In each confrontation, the text showed its own charm, and Yukio Mishima believed that history was accumulated because of the continuity of time, but Masahiko Wasabi rejected such a concept.
He uses the "Liberated Areas" as an example, cognition and action are opposites, and the interpretation of history is compared with the words "Thinking is the Liberated Areas" in contrast to the three words. The turning point of the two people disagreed, and this turning point puzzled many people, and the development of the 1970s and the light of the 1960s, the sense of loss suddenly emerged.
Above personal emotions, many values and ideals become wreckage and continue to expand their influence. Although the speed of collecting money is very slow, the doctrine added to the various words has touched many people. There are discussions of subjects and objects, many people are difficult to understand this text, and even people without knowledge and cultural foundations will look very difficult, but those who understand and understand will also be clear about their respective positions.
The system of concern of UTOK is the relationship of individual oppression, and simply wants to overthrow such a system. The group of people who are fighting all in this together are anarchists in the broad sense of the word, wanting everyone to play freely, and the traditional norms are more like a bondage for everyone. At that time, the relationship was complicated, the line battle was very serious, and even infighting was a battlefield without smoke.
Fortunately, Yukio Mishima, who is a militarist, is primarily dramatic about his self-perception.
Whether history is sustainable or not, and if the Liberated Areas cannot be maintained for a long time, then what is the significance? In Masahiko Wasabi's words, it can be felt that he longs to see the space of the Liberated Areas, to be freed from the shackles of a single observation, and thus to deny time. Perhaps his ideas are more avant-garde, and he feels that the current situation of each occurrence is not a collective long-term continuation.
Yukio Mishima, on the other hand, felt that whether it was a liberated area or anything would become history.
Because of the continuous superposition, under the accumulation of time and the inclusion of years, there is gradually precipitation. Although there is no other possibility, vertical time is like a record, and it may be possible to re-explore and propose new concepts. Debate is like an exchange, there is no absolute right, there is no definite error, seeking resonance in the exploration.
Everyone has an independent mind and thinks differently about things.
The difference in concept, like a rubber band, is elastic and soft, and everyone is impressed. For the theory of totem, there is not much difference in essence, it is an affirmation of belief. But it does not negate the value and meaning of giving, and when watching this documentary, everyone has their own context, but it cannot be generalized, from abstract philosophy, to sincere introduction, and the implementation of action strategies.
Everyone has self-confident values and ideals, just like ordinary people in life, starting from different angles and finally coming to different conclusions. The inconsistencies in values and the understanding of things are also different. I don't know how much time will pass, maybe this history will become a great tragedy, and many people will participate in this debate.
The feud between histories condenses many important functions.
If viewed from the point of view of the winner, everything is taken for granted, even the highlight of honor. And from the loser's point of view, if you can do it all over again, there seem to be a lot of places that don't mean completely correct, nor do they mean completely wrong. Everyone has their own starting point, but it doesn't mean that preemptive strikes are a mistake, or that one of them is right, and Mishima ends up in an ironic way.
But he should be a nationalist in essence, and the human heart is the most important thing compared to the content of the justification.
From different perspectives, it all feels like a kind of correctness, but when all the correctness is condensed together, there seems to be contradiction. Sometimes it is not society that is complicated, but the human heart. The problem is not complicated, but the extended level is relatively wide, and gradually it is very wide and complex.
In the process of thinking, weighing the pros and cons is also the trend of people's hearts. Maybe a hundred people watch, there will be a hundred understandings, but everyone will give a different opinion.
Debate itself is an exchange, and when many opinions are put together, controversy is inevitable. This is not only a debate in thought, but also a manifestation of self-ability. There is no battlefield where there is smoke and smoke, and the charm of words is released.
Only those who have watched it will be deeply touched, although it is difficult to get rid of the relationship, but it is a deep memory for everyone. There is no absolute correctness, there is no complete error, there seems to be a very reasonable, and on the basis of reasonableness, what should be?