Mr. Qi Gong is opposed to the study of engravings and advocates the study of inkblots. But this is also obviously narrow and one-sided.
First, the same post. In most cases, the visual effect of the engraved copy is more exciting, more contrasting, and more golden than the ink copy. Therefore, the engraving should also be learned. This is in line with the principle of "taking the law as it should be".
Second, yes, the study of inkblots. It is easier to realize the true brushwork of the original work. However, this is not inconsistent with learning the engraving.
Third, scholarship should blossom into a hundred flowers. Both engravings and inkblots have merit. The best way: to engrave the purpose, to ink as the means. Don't be biased.