<h1 class="pgc-h-decimal" data-index="01" data-track="2" > Chinese smallholder farmers under marketization</h1>
In the 1990s, China's agriculture underwent a major reversal - from short supply to a new stage in the history of oversupply, from the pursuit of quantitative growth benefits to the pursuit of value and value to increase production. When China's small-scale peasant agriculture has achieved a historical leap from short supply to oversupply, only by organizing thousands of small farmers -- becoming organized modern small farmers -- can small farmers pursue the value and price growth of agricultural products, and can they maintain the agricultural reproduction cycle and the reproduction cycle of peasant population. Otherwise, thousands of small farmers will fall into the trap of disorderly production and vicious competition that the more they want to make money, the more they want to make money, the more they must pursue to increase production, the more they will not increase their income, and even the harvest will be reduced, and it will be inevitable to be poor through hard work, and even the more diligent they are, the more tragic their fate will be, and eventually the family population will not be able to complete simple reproduction.
There were more than 200 million small peasant households in our country, and when they were "liberated" from the people's communes in the early 1980s, their enthusiasm for production soared, and at that time there was a shortage of agricultural products, and increasing production was to increase income, and thousands of small peasants lived a good life of about ten years. However, when entering the mid-1990s, there was a balance between supply and demand or oversupply of major agricultural products, and the highly dispersed more than 200 million small farmers would not increase their income or reduce their incomes if they increased production, but many highly dispersed small farmers could only choose to increase production desperately in order to pursue more income (because they could not pursue the value of agricultural products and price increases), and the 200 million small farmers as a whole entered the trap of dispersed smallholder farmers' enthusiasm for production - that is, the vicious circle of "increasing production and reducing income, hard work and poverty".
Highly dispersed smallholder farmers (because they don't have any bargaining power, let alone pricing power), what to buy is expensive, what to sell is cheaper. Raising pigs cannot be raised without making money; raising dairy cows cannot be raised without making money; growing grain cannot be planted without making money. Finally, many highly dispersed smallholder farmers have only one option: the elderly stay behind, and the young and middle-aged have to work outside the home to keep their families from going bankrupt. The original cause is actually that family farming reproduction and population reproduction cannot be simply recycled!
The thousands of highly dispersed small farmers in our country are actually the saddest farmers in the world!
<h1 class="pgc-h-decimal" data-index="02" data-track="32" > Chinese small enterprises under globalization</h1>
When thousands of highly dispersed small farmers can only choose to leave their homes to sell their labor force to earn income to keep their families from bankruptcy, this provides a rich and cheap labor force for coastal areas to undertake the gradient transfer of globalized general manufacturing.
Once upon a time, "no work, no wealth" was the true truth. As hundreds of millions of cheap laborers poured into the southeast coast, thousands of small businesses that earned foreign exchange for export sprung up. So the global general manufacturing industry has appeared "China's inflection point" - from the shortage of supply to oversupply, the general manufacturing industry must be from the pursuit of quantitative increase in production income to the pursuit of value and price increase income change, but highly dispersed small business owners and highly dispersed small farmers, can only pursue the number of increased production gains, so there is a small business owner production enthusiasm trap - the more money is not profitable, the more production, the more losses, "no work and no rich" has become a fallacy.
In the context of globalization, China's small businesses produce what is cheaper; what they buy, what they buy, what they raise prices. In the context of today's global epidemic, does China supply more than half of the general industrial products to the world, making money? If you don't make money, the more you produce, the more money you lose.
China's general manufacturer's global status is exactly the same as that of China's small farmers in China.
<h1 class="pgc-h-decimal" data-index="03" data-track="33" > valley hurts farmers, and the people hurt the country</h1>
Gu means hurt the peasants, this sentence is understood by everyone. What about the people who hurt the country? This sentence may have to be understood by some explanation.
The more production there is, the more it loses, and the more it has to expand production, which is called the untouchable; the production of good things, the natives do not consume or cannot afford to consume, subsidized exports exclusively for foreign consumption, this is called untouchables. When "untouchables" and "untouchables" occur at the same time, on the one hand, more and more production and more and more exports, the country's "material" and "resource" reserves are becoming less and less, the environment is getting worse and worse, more and more imported raw materials are becoming more and more expensive, and the two-level differentiation is becoming more and more serious, which is called hurting the country; on the other hand, more and more exports, more and more foreign exchange reserves, not only subject to people, but also hated and suspected by people, and isolated, this is called national injury. The people will hurt the country!
<h1 class="pgc-h-decimal" data-index="04" data-track="34" > organized to return the purpose of developing production and international trade to its roots</h1>
The purpose of developing production is to meet the growing material and cultural needs of the people of the country; the purpose of foreign trade is to exchange more good and cheap materials and resources for a better life for the people of the country.
China must organize thousands of highly dispersed small farmers into organized modern small farmers to pursue the value of agricultural products and the benefits of price growth; China must organize thousands of highly dispersed small enterprises engaged in general manufacturing to pursue the value and price growth benefits of general manufacturing products.
Only when the purpose of developing production and international trade can we return to its roots, will the national economy have internal circulation, will it be free from being controlled by people, and can it get along with the international community in a friendly manner and jointly build a community with a shared future for mankind.
For the people, what is so bad about setting production by need and sales, and being rich is safe? For the country, independent development, with the "internal circulation" as the mainstay, trying to reduce some foreign exchange reserves, living water for a long time, what is the disadvantage?
【Note】Please respect the copyright when forwarding, indicate the author's name and content source, thank you for forwarding, welcome to criticize!