Can't answer like or dislike. The narrator itself cannot take care of everyone, but it can be in line with the public, and if it is opposed by the majority, it means that this person needs to consider the development of the profession of explaining, rather than continuing with a thick skin.
For Yang Ying's explanation, it may be necessary to talk about it from the following points, before expounding the point, I will first say that I do not agree with her explanation!
First, since Yang Ying can be used as a commentator, it shows that her understanding of this profession is worth affirming, no matter how high the understanding! In addition, Yang Ying's development in this industry can also be known to the public. Therefore, as a commentator, some understanding and understanding within the profession can definitely be there.
Second, Yang Ying explains the familiarity of the contestants. It can be said that there is a certain familiarity, after all, her own position determines that she can get close to these players.
Third, Yang Ying's personal feeling of the business is not refined! The reasons are: 1. Fairness and impartiality. The bias that existed in Yang Ying's explanation was more obvious. There is more than enough praise for the players they like, of course, everyone has their own biases, but as a commentator, this bias should not be brought to work. 2. Neglect of technical explanations. In the process of Yang Ying's explanation, what often happened was "how is this person, or how is that player" setting and chatting with guests for a long time. 3. The prejudgment information is uncertain or dare not express opinions. When we watch Deng Yaping and Liu Guoliang's commentary, they will talk about which player will be next, and what their opponents will do. Correct or not, but this kind of comment will at least bring some added to the fans' learning. But Yang Ying will not, she will only say "next, which player must be what". But it's also ambiguous. So these all reflect that Yang Ying's business is not refined!
Fourth, the acceptance of the public. From the beginning of Yang Ying's explanation, the public's acceptance was good. But as time went on and the problems she kept highlighting in her commentary. The public's acceptance of her is also becoming more and more incomprehensible! After the emergence of some network commentators in the later stage, many people abandoned the live broadcast of Yang Ying's CCTV, and even appeared that Yang Ying had no sound. This is becoming increasingly embarrassing.
Fifth, the combination of professional and popular. In the process of Yang Ying's explanation, it is all popular and professional things, but it is always omitted too much. However, we have asked Liu Wei as a commentator several times, but there are also problems of professionalism that are not popular, which has also caused a situation that is accepted by the public but is not easy to accept. Therefore, the combination of professional and popular, the public is more receptive. The narrator is different from the common people, but they are also ordinary people!
On the whole, Yang Ying's explanation needs to be improved, but it is worth affirming at the professional level, but it still needs to be learned at the business level.
From the matter of Yang Ying's explanation, we also found some problems in the interpretation industry. We need professional people to do professional things, but we need professional people to be fair and just when doing explanations, and to give the people a more psychological and balanced view. The right and wrong of the players present may be biased towards who is decided by the people themselves, rather than guided by the language of the commentators. After all, many people who love this movement have their own understanding. Only by improving our explanations of these questions can we be more acceptable to the public.
So now the network commentators, although they have not achieved perfection, but their changes are also obvious to all. And the public acceptance is also higher. Although there are many problems, we have also found improvements in their later stages. Now the CCTV commentator has finally changed, and the response is also very good, which shows that the voice of the people is very important.
Maybe we will change it and get better results. Why do we have to be rigid, we have to be disciplined? Within the rules of language norms, proper dress, and civilized behavior, it is not impossible for our interpretation to be changed!