Lin Yishi was fined 4 million yuan for false declaration of assets The anti-penalty lawsuit shows a glimmer of light

According to Taiwan's "Zhongshi Electronic News," Lin Yishi, former secretary general of Taiwan's "Executive Yuan," was found by the "Control Yuan" to have not truthfully declared 63 million yuan (NT$, the same below) property, and was fined 4 million yuan.

According to reports, Lin Yishi served as a Kuomintang "legislator" in 2010 and successively accepted a bribe of 63 million yuan from Chen Qixiang, the head of Diyong Company, and was sentenced. After the matter was exposed, the "Control Yuan" believed that he deliberately concealed NT$20 million, US$950,000 and US$317,500 property, equivalent to about NT$60 million, and fined 4 million yuan in accordance with the "Property Declaration Law".

Lin Yishi filed a complaint against the punishment, and after the trial, Beigaoxing held that the punishment was based on the "law", and the judgment was rejected, Lin was not satisfied, and then appealed to the highest line.

According to the Supreme Bank, the original judgment referred to Chen Qixiang's payment of a bribe of US$317,500 on April 22, 2010, and Lin Yishi's delivery of his wife Peng Aijia to hide in the safe deposit box in June of the same year, finding that "deliberately concealing the property was a false declaration", but when Lin declared the property on December 30 of the same year, the US dollar was no longer in the safe deposit box, the original judgment did not investigate the subsequent gold flow, and it was found that Lin "deliberately concealed" rather than simply "false declaration", that is, the judgment did not apply the "regulations" and the improper application violated the "decree".

In addition, whether the "Control Yuan" made a list of "Funds and Flow of Funds Received by Lin Yishi from Chen Qixiang" was the same as the criminal judgment determination, the original trial did not borrow a file from the Criminal Court for investigation, nor did it prompt Lin to know and have an opportunity to debate, and simply recognized that the list was true, violated the relevant provisions of the Administrative Procedure Law, and then abandoned the original judgment and sent it back to Beigaohang as another appropriate legal judgment.