In the past few days, I don't know whether it is organized or not, and the attack on Chen Xingjia and his public welfare foundation has formed an overwhelming trend, and the harm to China's charity is obvious, and the masses have been greatly misled. If no one clarifies the truth, I am afraid that the harm of Guo Moumou's incident will repeat itself. Two days ago, I wrote two clarifications, but I failed to achieve the effect of correcting the chaos and correcting the audio-visual, and today I write again, hoping that the blinded netizens can have a correct understanding.
First, the standard of the legal source of funds donated by charitable foundations is completely different from the understanding of the general public. The source of charitable funds is legal, mainly referring to the legal fundraising process, and there is no need to conduct a substantive legality review of the donated funds. Public welfare foundations do not have public power, and their unique purpose of establishment and organizational characteristics determine that the law cannot put forward substantive requirements for them to review the legality of funds, and it is still the case for banks, let alone foundations. For example, when raising charitable funds publicly, donation boxes can be set up, and everyone can donate voluntarily and freely, is it required that the foundation set up a special review post at the outlet and conduct the necessary field investigation? Or let Mr. Matilda and the like give proof of the legitimacy of the funds? What is even more excessive is that in order to attack Chen Xingjia and Chinese philanthropy, in this storm, they not only proposed a legality review, but also asked Chen Xingjia to review whether the funds were ethical.
Therefore, this donation or the original fund established by The Constant Fund Foundation is no problem, and it has reached the review standard of the civil affairs department and the audit standard of Lixin Certified Public Accountants.
Come, look at the provisions of the Charity Law, don't say you don't understand.
Second, there is a limit to the disclosure of information on donors and funds to the public. The special purpose of helping the poor and helping the poor determines that it is impossible and should not be possible or desirable to disclose the information of the recipient to the public without reservation. Colleges and universities still consider the dignity of students in terms of information disclosure and funding methods, not to mention donations to the families of medical workers who have died in the line of duty. The Market-Guide Foundation also has a public welfare project for the children of fallen medical workers, which also does not disclose the information of the recipients to the whole society. Of course, if you donate a certain amount of money, they will disclose it to you; they will also disclose it to the auditing agency and the regulatory authorities. In 2019, Chen Xingjia's Henghui Charity Foundation scored 100 points in transparency, ranking first in Shenzhen. If you say that the results of the investigations made by these professional and specialized institutions in accordance with laws and regulations are placed here, you still do not approve of them, which is self-evident that they have ulterior motives and are aimed at stirring up nonsense, that is, destroying public welfare undertakings.
Third, this donation, the source of funds is clear, the direction of expenditure is indeed, and bank statements have been provided in and out, which is beyond doubt. The Market-Guide Foundation has issued public statements twice, providing original documents for the entry and exit of funds, which are clear, clear, specific, have basic judgment, and can also get correct conclusions. Including Mr. Matilda, who began to call the fiercest, he was not entangled in the question of whether the funds were indeed donated, but instead pestered whether the donor should be called Fang Fang or Wang Fang. There are some people who take ignorance as fun, for traffic or other purposes, stubbornly entangled, unreasonable trouble. Its purpose is obviously no longer aimed at Chen Xingjia, but at this young and weak charity that it represents.
Chen Xingjia and his people, for all to see, can be said to be a noble person, a pure person, a person who is detached from low-level interests, and a person who is beneficial to the people. Ordinary, but great; ordinary, but noble; unheard, but proud! Of course, we must not allow the evil forces to unscrupulously slander Chen Xingjia and his charity, which is something that a loved Chinese naturally wants to do. I hope that those bad people, whose conscience will find out as soon as possible, love their own country, love their compatriots, and love the outstanding sons and daughters of the Chinese nation even more.