Jiugu
On October 5, the 26th round of the China League One, Chengdu Rongcheng and Heilongjiang Bingcheng, in the 61st minute, Zhang Yinuo threw the ball directly into his own goal. After the game, the entire Chinese football world was stunned, and even some fans thought that Zhang Yinuo had gambled.
I don't believe that Zhang Yinuo gambled on the ball, or that Zhang Yinuo was unlikely to gamble.
There are two main reasons for this: First, the overall environment of Chinese football is relatively not very good. At this time, if someone dares to gamble the ball, it must be a "habitual offender" who must have such courage. But until the birth of this oolong ball, the world did not know much about Zhang Yinuo.
Second, Zhang Yinuo's dramatic scene is not "the first", in the 2004 J League Kashiwa Helios vs. Hiroshima Three Arrows Battle, the former goalkeeper Nan Yuta also threw the ball, also "threw" the ball into the gate of the side, and Zhang Yinuo's entire action was almost exactly the same as Nan Xiongtai. The only difference is that after Nan Xiongtai "scored", he was first shocked, and then went straight to the net to check the ball, Zhang Yinuo crawled back with a rolling belt to catch up with two steps, found that it was irreparable, and then knelt on his knees, and finally his whole body threw himself on the ground and held his head with both hands, a look of pain.
It is estimated that in the entire world football world, such a strikingly similar oolong goal is also in these two cases. Therefore, the first reaction of domestic fans is that Zhang Yinuo "pays tribute" to Nan Xiongtai, and the "terrier" is such a terrier.
Of course, whether I believe it or not is one thing, whether Zhang Yinuo gambled or not is another matter, and I just say my personal opinion here. I agree with some fans that the Chinese Football Association or professional leagues should investigate this matter, which is very necessary. Even if the facts are clear, Zhang Yinuo only plays abnormally, and he can return his innocence.
However, on October 6, Chu Liang in qianguomen District commented on this through his personal social platform, and one of the sentences said this-
"If you are a fan or an outsider, as a hilarious look, say a few cool words, I think it is up to him to go." But as some experienced insiders, not only do not look at the problem objectively, but instead coax the rhythm, I think it is not advisable, after all, if we eat this line of people do not maintain our environment, who else can help us? ”
To be honest, I was deeply shocked by this, even more than watching Zhang Yinuo's oolong goal.
First, Zhang Yinuo's goal, is it really because of a mistake or some other reason, before there is no serious investigation, the results of the investigation have not come out, anything may exist.
That being the case, as a former national gate and having a high prestige in Chinese football, how can Ou Chuliang, who has a preconceived notion, think that this is just a mistake and "nothing more"? Such an arbitrary conclusion, I am afraid it is not appropriate, right? If the conclusion of the investigation is contrary to this, won't you appear to be very faceless?
Second, the reason why the title of the article says "I don't believe Ou Chuliang's words" is because I don't believe that Ou Chuliang would say such a thing.
How many comments of "experienced insiders" are "not objectively looking at the problem", that is, "coaxing with rhythm"? Leaving aside whether Zhang Yinuo plays a match-fixing, "people who eat a line of food" must "help" insiders regardless of right or wrong, regardless of right or wrong, regardless of right or wrong? To do so is to "look at the problem objectively"? On the contrary, it is "coaxing with rhythm", which is "undesirable" behavior?
Whatever Sun Wukong does is wrong, the goblin is right, what is the difference between this and Tang Monk?
Besides, when did Chinese football have a "inside the circle" and "outside the circle"? In any case, even if it is wrong, the "insider" must also move towards the "circle" and help the "circle", and the elbow cannot be turned outward, which is "desirable". Otherwise, is it "not maintaining our environment"? I would like to ask, what kind of "environment" does Ou Chuliang want to maintain?
If the "insiders" don't help themselves, no one can help them anymore? Is there no one outside the "outside the circle" who is upright, tells the truth, really helps Chinese football, and is really good for Chinese football? What logic is this called!
To be honest, I really feel sad. 不是为区楚良，而是因为他是前国门、现国家队助理教练。
区楚良一向为人低调——包括他当国脚或者助理教练时，也从来没有听说过他有什么“污点”、绯闻之类。 However, just in terms of the attitude towards Zhang Yinuo's oolong ball this time, I think that Ou Chuliang's above remarks are not objective and have not been considered well, and he is too eager to express his views. Not only that, but also hurried to defend Zhang Yinuo, which made people feel that it was not only "not objective", but even very subjective.
Using one's own subjectivity to criticize others for being "not objective" is first and foremost "robber logic." Second, to measure others by their own standards is to preemptively stand on the moral high ground. Perhaps, Ou Chuliang's starting point is good, but the approach itself is not necessarily correct. Not only can it be incorrect, but it can even be wrong and harmful. Because of his words, a bamboo pole overturned a boat of people.
From this small thing, it can be seen that the "big environment" of Chinese football, including Chinese football, is getting worse and worse because there are many "non-objective" words and deeds. The "famous hosts" of Chinese football and the assistant coaches of the national team are like this.
这么说，不是对区楚良个人有什么成见、看法。 On the contrary, I stand on an objective and impartial standpoint, impartial, discuss things on the facts, and "help" Chu Liang.
Right is right, wrong is wrong. Those who are right should be supported and carried forward, and those who are wrong should be criticized and corrected. Right and wrong must be clearly distinguished, there can be no ambiguity, and there can be no mutual protection. Only in this way, Chinese football has begun to improve.
If you are all hello, I am good to everyone, see the shortcomings and mistakes of others do not point out, do not criticize, and even hear others criticize and jump up, immediately accuse others of "not objective", "not helpful", "no moral bottom line", this can only be harmful to Chinese football and not beneficial.
Small mistakes do not change, and eventually become big mistakes - I would like to encourage Ou Chuliang in this way.
(Today's headlines are monographs, and it is forbidden to reprint them in names other than my own without permission!) All the pictures are from the free image library of today's headlines, if there is infringement, please contact to delete. Thank you! ）