The Henan college entrance examination answer card transfer package incident, which caused a sensation in the whole country, has recently yielded results, and the results of the relevant candidates are accurate. Similar incidents have occurred many times before, and the vast majority of them have been confirmed to be candidates who lied.
After the end of the college entrance examination this year, Su Hong, a procurator in Zhoukou City, Henan Province, and four other parents posted online that the difference between their children's college entrance examination scores and actual scores was too large, and they suspected that the answer cards had been transferred. On August 7, the Henan Provincial Recruitment Office responded that the confirmation answer card was answered by the candidates themselves, and the results were accurate. The next day, after reading the answer card, Xinyang examinee Li Mou admitted that the answer card was written by himself. During the period, some netizens found that Su Hong's daughter passed the preliminary examination of independent enrollment at Beijing Normal University and Communication University of China, and two papers she published were suspected of plagiarism. In response, Su Hong said that the world's articles are copied, which is very normal.
Another candidate, Yu Mou, had very unstable results in the mock exam and was questioned by netizens about the possibility of cheating.
On August 11, the Henan Provincial Discipline Inspection Commission Supervision Commission reported the results of the investigation, and after judicial appraisal, confirmed that the candidates' answer cards were all written by themselves, and there was no phenomenon of others imitating handwriting to answer and adjust packages.
In recent years, there have been dozens of similar college entrance examination "package transfer incidents" reported by the media alone. In 2002, there was a "package adjustment" incident in Shanxi that shook the whole country. Yang Xiaocong, a candidate at Yongji Shubei Middle School, ranked among the best in the school in the two mock exams, and his own assessment score was about 590 points, but the actual test score was only 357 points. After reviewing the examination papers, she said that the composition questions were wrong and that the language examination papers were not written by herself. The incident attracted national attention, and Shanxi formed a joint investigation team to investigate. However, when the investigation team asked Yang Xiaocong to provide handwriting for identification, she and her family were reluctant to cooperate. In the end, after three judicial appraisals, it was confirmed that Yang Xiaocong's examination paper was written by herself, and the results were accurate.
In 2009, Zhang Shiyue, a candidate at Beizhen Middle School in Binzhou City, Shandong Province, posted that her college entrance examination score was changed from 627 points to 295 points, and then Zhang Shiyue's school released her several mock test results, all of which were only two or three hundred points, and Zhang Shiyue had to admit to lying.
In 2012, Xiao Ying, a science examinee at the Fourth Middle School in Hengyang County, Hunan Province, said that her first SMS check score was 695 points, which was 10 points higher than the highest score in the province that year, but the next day's re-check became 229 points, but after the media investigation, it was found that Xiao Ying scored about 200 points in the three mock tests. After a review organized by the Hunan Provincial Education Examination Institute, it was confirmed that Xiao Ying's score was indeed only 229 points.
In 2013, Yang Tingting, a candidate for the Liberal Arts department in Hui'an, Fujian Province, posted that her college entrance examination score was changed from 586 points to 364 points, which triggered a hot discussion on the Internet. Under the pressure of public opinion, the Fujian Education Examination Institute released all four examination papers of Yang Tingting to the media, confirming that her college entrance examination score was indeed only 364 points. Yang Tingting filed a lawsuit with the court, asking for the examination paper to be made public to herself, which was rejected by the court.
After investigation, the reporter found that only two incidents were confirmed as on-site transfers. In 2000, Lu Wei, a candidate in Wuhan, Hubei Province, was wrapped up in the same examination room by Zhang Wentao, a candidate in the same examination room. After the incident, Lu Wei was admitted to Hubei University, and Zhang Wen, who had been admitted to Hubei Finance and Economics College, was ordered to withdraw from school. In 2005, there were two candidates in the third middle school examination center in Mianxian County, Shaanxi Province, who took advantage of the opportunity to go out after the test, and exchanged other people's examination papers with their own examination papers. Due to the timely discovery, two cheaters were disqualified and three victimized candidates were successfully admitted. However, at that time, the examination paper did not use a bar code, the candidate's information was handwritten, and now the answer card needs to be checked and pasted with a disposable bar code at the beginning of the exam, which is difficult to temporarily change.
The fairness of the college entrance examination has once again been confirmed, which has made countless students and parents feel at ease. However, in the past package transfer incidents, no candidate who lied has ever been held responsible. Cheating should be severely punished, so don't you have to pay the corresponding cost of lying?
About the college entrance examination, let the news fly a little longer
Litchi Xiaobian thinks: Candidates lie, the reasons may be different, but their cost is all zero. If the benefits of lying far outweigh the risks, then moral power alone cannot stop the liar. Not only the middle and high school entrance examinations, independent admissions and even ordinary examinations, but also must not allow any space for cheating and fraud. Let children remember from an early age that the cost of lying is too great to bear, in order to build an honest society!
Media Views:
The People's Daily's microblog published the people's micro-comment "Honesty for the College Entrance Examination, for Life": No one can hurt the fairness of the college entrance examination, otherwise it will shake the public's simple belief in the college entrance examination. I hope that the students involved who are on the cusp of the storm can return to normal life after this "tossing", and face the future life with a more honest attitude.
Wang Kaidong, vice principal of Suzhou Middle School, asked: If the loophole in the college entrance examination is plugged, can the loophole of independent enrollment be plugged? Two papers submitted by a student on their own admissions are suspected of being fraudulent. So, how many Mr. Nanguo are there in the growing self-recruitment team in the country? How many fake foreign devils are there? How many counterfeits are there? Isn't that worth pondering?
China Youth Daily questioned whether the liar needs to be held responsible: No punishment for the liar is a reward and encouragement, and it is unfair to other honest and trustworthy candidates and parents, so it is necessary to severely punish the liars in the Henan examination paper transfer incident.