Sikkim was one of the traditional vassal states of the Qing Dynasty, the Kingdom of Jemengxiong, an independent kingdom in South Asia, but was annexed by India in February 1975 and eventually evolved into a state of India. The reason why India annexed Sikkim very strongly is actually because it is the boss in South Asia. Although India did not form its own unified culture and was ruled by the British for a long time, it had great ambitions after independence. India is a country with civilization, no history, and no national consensus. English is the official language of India, but there are more than a dozen official languages in India. Linguistic unity within India, coupled with the great autonomy of the states, makes it difficult to implement policies throughout the country. Even to solve the problem of toilets, India has made great efforts, but it has not been able to solve it well so far.
Of course, India has a big advantage, that is, India does not have a strong opponent in South Asia, and in several wars within South Asia, India has won the final victory. Therefore, India has always liked to create conflicts and frictions in the border areas, giving people the feeling that India is always fighting. In fact, India has created conflicts and frictions in the border areas, and in addition to diverting internal contradictions, it also has the intention of encroaching on the land of other countries. India's annexation of Sikkim and its transformation into a state of India is the strongest proof of its acquisition of land. In addition, India also has border disputes with countries such as Nepal in the border area, and India has forcefully sent troops to occupy many disputed lands. In recent years, India has been stepping up its border areas, building infrastructure such as roads and bridges, and even directly on disputed land in Nepal, which of course has led to conflict.
India has increased its troops to provoke border troubles, and in the case of deep domestic contradictions, it has tried to create conflicts and frictions, divert internal contradictions, and resolve internal crises. British Sky News Network reported on May 21 that India has recently begun to increase troops to the border areas on a large scale, especially to the areas of Dianjiao, Galwan Valley, Doola special Ori area, Pangongcuo Lake area, Kalapani (Kalapani) - Limpiyadhura - Lipulekh and other areas. Of course, India has also added troops to Kashmir to deal with tensions everywhere. The Times of India claimed on May 21 that India's increase in troops in Kashmir was mainly due to the constant chaos caused by the local rebel forces and accused the Pakistani side of armed cross-border attacks. India also claimed to increase its troops in areas such as Kalapani-Limpiyadhura-Lipulekh, mainly because india's interests on the ground were challenged.
In fact, India's so-called reason for the increase in troops is just a pretext. India is experiencing a serious crisis, and its economy has experienced a serious decline, in the procurement of armaments also gave up the United States, Russia, Britain and France of the big order, began to change to the Mirage fighter, but in this context, it still insists on increasing troops to the border areas, and takes the initiative to provoke incidents, create conflicts and frictions, in fact, its thinking is very consistent with the United States, that is, to use the conflict to divert contradictions and distract the people's attention. Indians are generally not highly educated, and it is easy to be diverted by conflicts and frictions in border areas, which is the basic reason why India always likes to use conflicts to divert contradictions.
Nepal preferred to die and vowed to regain indian-occupied land at any cost. Nepal's national strength is relatively weak, and public information shows that the total strength of the Nepali armed forces is 43,000 (active duty, including 43,000 in the army and 28,000 paramilitary troops. The armament of the Nepal Army mainly includes 25 armored vehicles, more than 95 artillery pieces, and 12 land aviation aircraft. From these data, it is not difficult to see that Nepal's military strength is very weak. Although the military is weak and not India's opponent, at the critical moment, Nepal is still very tough, dares to speak out, and in the face of India's bullying, it can be said that it is unyielding. The Associated Press reported on May 21 that Nepal publicly decided to adjust the map to include areas such as Liplek, Kalapani and Limbadila, which are "disputed" with India, as part of Nepal's territory.
At the same time, Nepal used the only helicopter to transport troops to changlu no man's land at an altitude of 5,000 meters, set up checkpoints, and resolutely blocked the Indian army from moving north. Nepal's Prime Minister Ollie, who was very tough in the face of India's pressure, pointed out strongly that Nepal would not back down and would "take back" the Kalapani-Limpiyadhura-Lipulekh region at all costs. These three regions are also the most central areas of territorial dispute between India and Nepal. Ollie's vow to retake Indian-occupied territories at all costs underscores toughness and a counterattack against India.
India's initiative to provoke trouble, and the increase in troops on the border will not solve the problem, and will only exacerbate the internal crisis. The biggest and only destabilizing factor in the entire South Asian subcontinent is India! India has always wanted to be a big country with a voice and color, and has taken provoking incidents and creating conflicts as an important starting point for diverting internal contradictions, constantly peering into its neighbors, invading neighboring countries, provoking incidents, and there have been examples of Sikkim being annexed before, and the surrounding Bhutan, Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, etc. have been provoked by India's borders.
This time, Nepal gave a strong response to India's provocation, indicating that India's previous approach was no longer effective and no longer easy to use, and even the weaker Nepal was not willing to swallow its breath. India's initiative to provoke the incident and the beginning of an increase in troops to the border areas will only lead to tension in the border situation, undermine regional peace and are completely detrimental to the settlement of the problem. At the same time, India's increase in troops on the border will only eventually exacerbate the internal crisis.