Wang went to the supermarket to buy fish, but did not see the salesperson in the fresh food area and did not find the salvage tools, so Wang was ready to do it himself, but was infected by a fish stab during the bagging process, and was hospitalized for 30 days before being discharged. Are supermarkets liable for damages?
- Need to bear. Article 1198, Paragraph 1 of the Civil Code Operators or managers of hotels, shopping malls, banks, stations, airports, stadiums, entertainment venues and other business venues or public places, or organizers of mass activities, shall bear tort liability if they fail to fulfill their security obligations and cause damage to others. According to the provisions of this article, the obligation to ensure safety mainly refers to the obligation of the operators and managers of relevant places to protect others from personal and property damage within reasonable limits. In this case, the supermarket was at fault for not providing professional fresh fishing tools or special fishing services, nor did it fulfill its warning obligations, resulting in Lao Wang being stabbed when he fished on his own, and the supermarket should be liable for tort damages. At the same time, Lao Wang himself failed to fulfill his duty of care, and he was at fault and should also bear corresponding responsibility.
The Civil Code - an encyclopedia of social life
Broadcast Production: Guo Lan
Article source: original · Jilin News Comprehensive Broadcasting
Preliminary review: Wang Haoyi
Re-examiner: Hao Zili
Final review: Zhao Min
Poke the small flower in the lower right corner to share it with more people