#MCN首发激励计划#
Text: Mr. Mu Jinxi
Since the cheap buffet was exposed, many people have begun to come into contact with this business model, the store prepares a number of home-cooked side dishes, and the real price is clear for consumers to choose, and the general customer group is migrant workers.
It's just that with the informatization of the Internet, more and more people are downgrading their consumption, and they no longer resist fast food in the form of buffets, and the business of the store is also a lot better.
However, a dispute broke out in a 15 yuan self-service fast food restaurant in Tianjin, which was exposed by netizens and caused controversy among netizens.
"How do you eat it?"
"Who's going to eat for two hours?"
Netizens posted that because the man ate in the store for too long, the store was dissatisfied, and the two sides had an argument, and there were other people dining in the video screen, and everyone was stunned.
The accusations of netizens heated up the incident, but when more people saw the words spoken by the store, two points of contention appeared.
The store mentioned in the quarrel that the man went out to the toilet during the meal, came back and continued to eat the buffet, and ate for 2 hours in a row, thinking that the man was too much.
The man retorted that there was no time limit for fast food restaurants, and that he was doing so within the rules, and that the restaurant could not speak ill of him.
There are netizens who support the views of both sides, so there are two positions, one supports the store to drive out the man, and the other supports the man's refutation of the store's point of view.
In fact, there's much more to the video than that.
When the shopkeeper came up to talk about the man, the man was just as tough, and he provoked the shopkeeper to do it, almost causing a more violent conflict.
Some netizens explained why the store was so angry?
The cheap buffet format is about small profits but quick turnover, and the average customer will leave the store after they are full, and the store can entertain one more customer after cleaning up.
At that time, the time of the dispute was between eleven and half past twelve, which was when the nearby migrant workers were eating, and the man occupied a position, and the income was less.
At the same time, the store was thinking about serving a few more customers and achieving the goal of making a profit, and the man was going to delay the store to make money during lunch, which undoubtedly touched the interests of the store.
The store said in the video that the two men had been here before, and they really couldn't afford to eat in this way, and they were afraid of hurting them.
This is from the point of view of the store, and the man, as a consumer, also has his statement.
The man thinks that as long as the store [gf]fe0f[/gf] sets the time, they can eat as long as they want, and the store can't afford to catch them up.
Although this statement is a scoundrel, it accurately pokes at the loopholes in the business model of the fast food restaurant, no matter how angry the store is, in the end, it can't help the man.
This was originally a trivial matter in life, but after being exposed by netizens, it quickly rushed to the hot search.
Generally speaking, most restaurants in the form of buffets will set a time and require customers not to take out, so as to avoid similar situations.
When eating in a fast food restaurant, most customers will not stay after they are full, and they rarely delay the business of the store in the store, which is the consensus of many people.
The man represents another consumer group, who thinks that the store makes a lot of money, and after paying the money, they have to eat everything back, and they can't eat for a while to make the store earn a little less.
This is a typical behavior of "harming others and not benefiting oneself".
The shopkeeper's purpose for driving away the man was clear.
Assuming that the shopkeeper ignores the man's "little abacus" and allows the man to continue to stay, the man may stay in the store for a longer time, so the shopkeeper would rather tear his face and choose to kick the man out.
Unexpectedly, the man also recorded a video, and after exposing this clip, he wanted to take revenge on the store.
With the discussion of this matter, the store's behavior of driving customers has been infinitely magnified, which may affect its own business situation, and it can be regarded as paying the price for his behavior.
Looking back on this conflict, the key is that consumers and stores did not reach a consensus, the man wanted to take advantage, and the store was not used to seeing the man lying in the store, giving a warning to other businesses.
"You must think carefully about what problems exist in the way you do business, explain them in advance as much as possible, and don't think about solving potential problems by looking at yourself."
The 15 yuan buffet gives migrant workers the opportunity to eat a full meal, and for some people who are used to making trouble, I hope that they can let go of this market, and don't force the store to raise prices and affect the normal operation of the market.