In the first game of the CBA finals, on May 15, Beijing time, the Liaoning men's basketball team faced the Xinjiang team at home, but the result of the game was overshadowed by a referee turmoil.
The Xinjiang team suffered a fiasco and lost the suspense of the game, and the controversy over the referee's blowing penalty made this game even more interesting.
The first game of the CBA finals took place on May 15, Beijing time, and the Liaoning men's basketball team faced the Xinjiang team at home.
However, this match was not a good matchup, but a fiasco shrouded in refereeing turmoil.
The Xinjiang team had a poor performance in the game and was easily defeated by the Liaoning team in the end by losing suspense.
The introduction of the referee's identity shows that the referee is Yang Hongfeng, and the auxiliary referee has two referees from South Korea.
The referee team's blowing penalty during the game sparked huge controversy, especially for the six fouls committed by Xinjiang player Qi Lin.
Qi Lin broke out because he was dissatisfied with the referee's blowing penalty, loudly accusing the referee, and was finally sent off.
In the game, the Liaoning team had a clear advantage in free throws, while the Xinjiang team fell into the predicament of too many fouls, of which the sixth foul caused controversy.
Qi Lin's sixth foul was arguably one of the most intense moments of the game, and this scene also became the focus of controversy among the referees.
Slow-motion replays showed that Qi Lin's movements didn't seem to fully touch his opponent, much to the dissatisfaction of fans.
At that time, the atmosphere in the arena was tense, and the audience was speculating whether the penalty was fair.
A fan named Xiaogang expressed his opinion on Weibo: Qi Lin's foul this time was blown too much! It was obviously a slight contact, but the referee gave him a technical foul.
This has too much influence on the direction of the game! Xiao Gang's speech resonated with many fans, and everyone was dissatisfied with the referee's decision.
Subsequently, another fan, Wang Daniu, also left a message on social media: This referee is too one-sided! Qi Lin is a key player of the team, and once he is sent off, the strength of the Xinjiang team is greatly reduced.
Wang's comments caused more heated discussions among fans, and everyone began to question whether the referees had impartially enforced the rules of the game.
In addition to the criticism of the referee, some fans began to understand Qi Lin's emotional out-of-control.
A netizen wrote on the forum: It can be seen that Qi Lin is really irritated, and it is understandable that his emotions are out of control.
The referee's decision is unacceptable, and whoever is blown like this will explode.
These words resonated with many netizens, and everyone expressed their understanding of Qi Lin's behavior.
However, there were also some fans who expressed dissatisfaction with Qi Lin's verbal attacks.
A netizen left a message saying: Whether it is the opponent or the referee, the player should stay calm, and verbal aggression is not the right behavior.
The remarks caused some fans to think about how players should respond to the injustice in the game.
The referee's reaction became another focus of attention during the match.
The South Korean referees remained calm when Qi Lin angrily scolded the referee, but they did not let the misconduct go.
On the technical table, the referees made a severe counterattack and gave Qi Lin a technical foul penalty.
This scene sparked a discussion among many netizens.
Some people think that the referee's reaction was too harsh and that the players' emotions should be more understood.
A netizen left a message saying: The referee is too faceless! Obviously, there is a problem with the referee's blowing penalty, and it is understandable that Qi Lin is out of control, so why punish him so harshly?
This remark was supported by many fans, who believe that referees should be more cautious in dealing with players who are out of control.
However, some netizens expressed understanding and support for the referee's reaction.
One fan wrote on social media: The referee's job is to ensure that the game is played fairly, and they cannot tolerate attacks on them by players.
Qi Lin's behavior was unacceptable, and the referee gave him a technical foul penalty.
The remark struck a chord with some fans, who believed that the referee's reaction was to maintain order and fairness in the game.
The referee's reaction not only sparked heated discussions among netizens, but also had a significant impact on the game.
After Qi Lin was sent off, the Xinjiang team could not recover the disadvantage of the game and finally ended in a heavy defeat.
The 31-13 ratio of free throws to the game was even more impressive, and this obvious unfair treatment made fans very angry.
I don't know about Qi Lin, but under the influence of his grandmother Yang Jie, Qi Lin's childhood was closely linked to Peking Opera.
He has been fond of Peking Opera since he was a child, and unlike other peers, his mobile phone is not filled with pop music, but with classic Peking Opera songs such as "Wujia Po" and "Shilang Visiting Mother".
Grandma Yang Jie's love for Peking Opera influenced Qi Lin, and he spent more of his childhood at the Peking Opera Company.
This childhood experience has also become a hot topic among fans.
Some fans commented on social media: Qi Lin formed an indissoluble bond with Peking Opera when he was a child, and this cultural heritage must have played a great role in his growth.
These words resonated with many people, who all believed that Qi Lin's love for Peking Opera was part of his personality and one of the reasons why he performed so well on the court.
Other fans expressed envy and admiration for Qi Lin's childhood experience.
It seems that Qi Lin's childhood was too interesting! Being able to spend my childhood at the Peking Opera Company is sure to be a fond memory.
A fan left a message on the forum.
These words were echoed by other fans, who also expressed their envy of Qi Lin's childhood experience.
When Qi Lin was five years old, he followed his grandmother to the box office to watch Peking Opera, and this scene also triggered the memories of fans.
I started appreciating Peking Opera at the age of five, which is amazing! A fan expressed his feelings about Qi Lin's childhood experience.
These words were recognized by other fans, and they also expressed their admiration for Qi Lin.
What surprised fans even more was that Qi Lin also made a cameo appearance in Peking Opera in his childhood.
Qi Lin was able to make a cameo appearance in Peking Opera at the age of five, which is really talented! A fan posted a word of praise for Qi Lin on Weibo.
This remark also attracted the attention of other fans, and they all began to discuss Qi Lin's versatility.
Overall, Qi Lin's childhood was closely associated with Peking Opera, an experience that not only enriched his life experience, but also influenced his personality and behavior.
Fans expressed their envy and appreciation for his childhood experiences, believing them to be one of the important factors in his success as a good player.
This game was not won by the Liaoning team, but by the referee who lost to the Xinjiang team! A fan gave his opinion on the result of the match on the forum.
These words resonated with many fans, who all believed that the referee's controversial blowing penalty affected the outcome of the game and brought unfair treatment to the Xinjiang team.
The controversial nature of the referee's penalty greatly affected the outcome of the game and aroused widespread concern.
Despite Liaoning's excellent performance, the game focused more on the referee's decision than on the player's performance.
This referee turmoil will undoubtedly become an important topic in the CBA finals, which deserves further attention and reflection.
If you have any ideas, please leave a message in the comment area below.
If there are problems in the article, please point them out, and the editor will try to correct them.
Note: It is not easy to be original, and plagiarism and manuscript washing must be held responsible. The picture comes from the Internet, and the infringement is deleted.