The owner of the Great Wall gun was stuck in the neck of the electric tent and died, what could be the problem? A sketch illustrates the truth

The owner of the car was stuck in the neck and died, who will be responsible for this tragedy? With the increasing popularity of outdoor recreation equipment,

A vehicle-mounted electric tent unexpectedly caused a tragedy, which not only frightened the majority of riders, but also triggered the industry's deep thinking about potential safety hazards.

What is outrageous is that in this accident, the owner of the tent accidentally entered it during the lifting process, and as a result, he was firmly stuck by the key components that gradually moved back, and there was no way to fight back.

This can't help but shudder: how did the equipment originally used for outdoor rest become a "killer"?

Digging deeper into the cause of the accident, it is not difficult to find that there are many potential safety hazards in the design of this vehicle-mounted electric tent.

First of all, the key components in the process of raising and lowering the tent will move backwards under certain conditions, which is undoubtedly a time bomb.

In the manual, the relevant manufacturers do not seem to have a clear warning about this, let alone set up an emergency stop device, which makes it difficult for the owner to predict the danger.

Secondly, when the tent is lifted, the transition passage between the upper and lower floors will be open for a long time, which undoubtedly brings huge hidden dangers to the entrants.

Even the most cautious user can easily get caught in the tent during the rapid lifting process. This design is really dangerous.

What is even more infuriating is that the manufacturer involved only said that it "cooperated with the investigation" and "felt sad about the accident" in its statement after the accident, but did not take the initiative to take responsibility.

As manufacturers of products, can't they just escape their responsibilities?

We can't help but ask, why do manufacturers dare to promote such a product with huge potential safety hazards?

Are they really unaware of the threat to the lives of their users? Such "disregard" is truly outrageous.

In this case, we see not only the lack of responsibility of the manufacturer, but also the absence of the regulatory authority.

As an increasingly popular outdoor recreation equipment, this vehicle-mounted electric tent should undergo strict safety certifications before it can be put on the market.

But in fact, it has not only been successfully listed, but also become a "hot model" in the outdoor equipment industry to a certain extent. This regulatory vacuum undoubtedly laid the fuse for the tragedy.

There are all kinds of indications that the accident in which the owner was killed was not an isolated case. There will be more tragedies like this in the future, unless the parties involved take practical and effective measures.

As the majority of riders, we should also take caution. When purchasing and using this type of equipment, be vigilant, follow the safety guidelines in the manual, and stay away from dangerous areas.

Only by working together can we prevent more innocent lives from happening in the first place.