In order to facilitate you to see the latest content for the first time and have a better reading experience, welcome to "like and follow" to bring you wonderful information every day!
Text/Xiao Ning talks about sports
Editor/Xiao Ning talks about sports
Hot stars, charming stage style, and elegant artistic pursuits, this should have been the pinnacle of life that every artist yearns for. However, when someone acts recklessly and tarnishes art in order to win attention and grandstand, the scene full of warts is inevitably suffocating.
The new choreography of the former peacock dance queen Yang Liping once again aroused heated discussions among netizens, and the actor's almost naked appearance almost made people have the urge to "deprive themselves of their eyesight". The actor with dyed hair and a pair of flesh-colored ultra-thin panties danced, and his body with revealing lines was in full view. Under the backdrop of dazzling lights, it seems that the peacock is reborn in the world, and it is like a finch that has lost its hair and flees in embarrassment, doing its best to contradict and contrast.
Under the pretext of imitating the form of a courtship peacock, Yang Liping and her disciples did not hesitate to use this extremely bold and open expression technique. But this performance, which can be called the "best of peacocks", attracted a lot of boos from the audience and netizens. After all, when the artist is honest with the artistic taste and abandons the bottom line, the art will deviate from its proper elegance and character.
It should be that the noble and gorgeous artistry of the peacock dance is pleasing to the eye, who would have expected that the scene in front of him would be a bottomless nude performance? When the scene is so exciting that people can't take their eyes off it, where does the artistry reside? Yang Liping claims to be pursuing the supreme realm of art, but at the moment, what is the difference between this so-called "art" and the plot of some tertiary films?
Some netizens questioned: "Does art really need such a bottomless muscle dance to show?" How could the peacock dance, which was supposed to be such an elegant and noble art form, be reduced to the point where it only relied on the flesh to attract attention?" In fact, not only in the field of stage art, but also in the film and television entertainment industry and the fashion industry, such embarrassing scenes have been repeatedly staged. It seems to have become a trend to do things that go beyond the norm under the guise of "artistic dedication".
For example, in Yan Chengxu's new drama, the uncle pretends to be tender and falls in love with a little girl, which inevitably makes people feel nondescript. Don't look at him middle-aged and greasy, but once he plays an intimate scene, he has always worked very hard. At the age of 46 this year, he had some explicit bed scenes with a 25-year-old actress in the TV series, which really surprised the audience.
is also an older actor, Zhang Tielin once made some rude and excessive behaviors during the filming of "Heaven and Dragon Slayer", which scared the co-actor Tao Hong at the time. What's even more ironic is that Wei Daxun, who was scolded as a "groping pig's hand", also made a fuss under the banner of "artistic dedication". In an on-location reality show, Wei Daxun constantly physically harassed Li Qin, who knew that he was uncomfortable at a glance. Even if Li Qin clearly expressed his refusal with his actions, Wei Daxun still didn't know how to restrain himself, staring at Li Qin's body like a male wolf staring at a mastiff's head.
And Zhang Han's performance in the drama "Gentlemen of the East Eighth District" was called "miserable" by netizens. Zhang Han used his hands and feet against Wang Xiaochen, who played the heroine, which was simply blatant sexual harassment. It can be seen from the footage in the play that Zhang Han doesn't know whether it is unintentional or intentional, and he will touch Wang Xiaochen's private parts in many scenes. In the face of doubts, whether it is Zhang Han or Wei Daxun, their response is always a pattern: this is all for art, in order to pursue real artistic effects. But some viewers questioned how the filming of games and intimate scenes could be so unspeakable? Some celebrities simply take the opportunity to go naked directly to win attention and topics. For example, during the filming of the TV series "Tiandao", the director suddenly asked actress Zuo Xiaoqing to appear naked in a scene, although Zuo Xiaoqing felt a lot of pressure, but he reluctantly agreed because he was persuaded that "this is all for art". However, the scale of this plot is too large, and it was ruthlessly deleted in the end, and it obviously didn't have much of a bonus effect on the artwork.
What's even more suffocating is that the actress Tang Wei, who was controversial in the past because of some explicit bed scenes in "Lust and Caution", was once banned and regarded as an eternal "rat crossing the street". However, the director and the actor won the highest honor of the Golden Horse Award for this work, how unfair is such a "double standard".
In retrospect, it seems that since a certain artist shouted "I have dedicated my whole life to art", secretly dedicating myself has become an excuse for many hooligans and opportunists to take advantage of loopholes and gain popularity. As a result, "artistic dedication", which should be an elegant and ultimate pursuit, has been misinterpreted as a cover for wanton behavior and subversion of traditional aesthetics.
However, if you look closely, what art is there in this practice of "artistic dedication"? Is it just a matter of using the topic to find ways to satisfy the selfish desires and low-grade tastes of some people? Even directors have to admit that many of these scales exist just to gain attention and gain popularity.
Art should have a noble pursuit, should convey positive energy, and need to treat art itself and those who appreciate it with respect. Being bold and explicit does not mean that it is art, and not being embellished or concealed does not mean that it is art. The so-called art should be the sublimation of beautiful human nature, not the degradation of the flesh and the degradation of morality.
What artistic value does such a large-scale straightforwardness and nudity have? This is tantamount to pulling art off the altar and putting it in the mire for others to ravage. The blind pursuit of gorgeous stunts and performance scale is not the same as art, and it can even be said to be a blasphemy against art. True art should be the refinement of life and the sublimation of good qualities, not the connivance of obscenity.
Those artists and directors who are obsessed with using large-scale to win attention are actually driven by financial interests and personal selfish desires. They disguise these two as "artistic pursuits". Otherwise, how could there be so many absurd things of "doing indecent deeds in the name of artistic dedication"?
What is suffocating is that under the endless bombardment of portraitists, some art forms that should not exist have begun to spread in society, as if this is the "new fashion of art". And once someone questions it, they will always be sprayed, which is "not understanding art". I can't help but ask: is this kind of artistic concept that blindly pursues gimmicks really what every artist should pursue? How do artists who work on their backs crawl on the vast night road, forgetting to sleep and eat to create, what do they think of this so-called "art"?
What do the artists who strive to spread positive energy and lead people to yearn for beauty feel about these "art" that has been reduced to slang and pornographic content? In contrast, actors like Jiang Wenli who did not hesitate to gain 30 pounds and appear ugly in order to deeply figure out the role; Like Qin Hao, who used his role in "The Long Season" to successfully reproduce the life anxiety and physical and mental troubles of middle-aged men, it can be called a classic of looking ugly...... The actors who take art seriously in this way really show the professionalism and professional ethics that artists should have.
Therefore, when we see some people doing something extremely transcendent under the banner of "artistic dedication", we have to question this: Is it really art that you dedicate your life? Or is it dedication to lust and money? Art is not an excuse for indulgence and recklessness, and art should not be reduced to a tool for some shameless people to vent their desires and grandstand. True art should be regarded as the supreme cause, the sublimation of the yearning for beauty and the epitome of noble sentiments. Only by maintaining a pious artistic pursuit can we create immortal artistic treasures and convey the true meaning of positive art.
Note: This article is original and only published in the headlines, plagiarism is prohibited, and the manuscript must be investigated. The picture comes from the Internet, if there is any false infringement, please contact to delete.