"It's not that you don't want to deliver food, it's to prevent someone from pretending to be a parent to deliver food."
"(The school cafeteria) deducts money for 700 a month for eating or not!"
On May 12, the head of a family in Hunan posted a video saying that the school did not allow parents to deliver meals, required students to eat in the canteen, and deducted money for 700 meals a month.
At the school gate, the teaching teachers and the police station were also arranged to jointly manage it, and they wore red vests to shoot the students who went out of the school gate to get food, which scared the students so much that they didn't dare to take the food.
In this regard, the school said: It is all to prevent people from pretending to be parents to deliver meals, and for the good of students.
The school said that it was not that parents were not allowed to deliver meals, but that it often happened that a person disguised himself as a parent to deliver meals, and as a result, more than a dozen people were delivered.
In other words, those who deliver to many people at a time are clearly takeaway or restaurant meals, not parents.
Loading...
In this regard, some netizens said: I can understand the school!
In case a student eats takeout and eats badly, or runs out and something happens, the school will be responsible in the end, and the school will be unlucky.
However, some students at the school said that the food in the cafeteria was not clean and unpalatable, and it was purely helpless to ask parents to deliver food or order takeout.
Now, for the sake of "student safety", the school is putting pressure on parents to deliver meals, imposing restrictions, trying to get everyone to return to the cafeteria to eat, and 700 yuan a month will be deducted for not even eating the cafeteria.
I have to use my brain every day to go to school, and I consume too much energy, and if I can't even guarantee a basic diet, it will greatly delay students' learning.
Netizens are hotly discussed
Students want to eat well, parents are worried about it, and parents will deliver meals. If it is only to ensure the food safety of students, it can also be unified to manage the behavior of parents delivering meals.
But if it is a one-size-fits-all and allows students to eat unpalatable cafeterias, it is like shirking management responsibilities.
Since the canteen is a bidding fee, it should ensure that the basic diet is clean and delicious, and does not seek to be full of color and flavor, at least without steel wool balls and insects.
If the quality of the canteen is passable, how can students be reluctant to eat the canteen? Instead of asking multiple parties to jointly manage, it is better to do more of their own work.
What do you think about this?