laitimes

Why are many people good at mathematics and physics, but not good at chemistry and biology?

author:Flying Xiaoyu

High school math and physics, chemistry and biology, although they are all science subjects, have completely different characteristics of science. Mathematics is the most abstract, and the requirements for computing ability are the highest, and physics can be regarded as the use of mathematical tools to use the scene, the establishment of object motion model is the main difficulty, the two disciplines are strongly related, mathematics is good physics, or physics is excellent, mathematics is not good, mathematics is not good, are very small probability events.

Chemistry and biology, without the abstraction of mathematics and the need for physical modeling, are typical natural sciences, with obvious application scenarios, and also correspond to the need for a large amount of memory, but this kind of memory is not the same as the memory of English and other disciplines, memory is only the foundation, understanding is the key.

Why are many people good at mathematics and physics, but not good at chemistry and biology?

Mathematics and physics are good, chemistry and biology may not be good at learning, but relatively speaking, for many science tyrants, their chemistry and biology still have obvious advantages compared with ordinary students, but as a scoring subject, the increase in the original score is not equal to the improvement of the final score, and its score improvement is not as cost-effective as mathematics, physics and English that calculate the original score.

According to the ranking and according to the score, there is a clear difference in the score space of the top students, mathematics may be 120 points to enter the top 5%, efforts to enter the top 1% can get 135 points, and chemistry and biology such assigned, may only improve by three points, which makes the top students more willing to concentrate and pursue high scores in mathematics and physics as much as possible, rather than chemistry and biology.

Why are many people good at mathematics and physics, but not good at chemistry and biology?

For students at the upper intermediate level, although they seem to have more room for improvement in mathematics and physics, if they achieve a certain level of good results, the required breakthrough will exceed the lower limit of their ability, and they will devote more energy to chemistry and biology after encountering an obvious critical point for improving their scores.

The difference in the degree of investment in chemistry and biology makes it more likely for students at the upper middle level to surpass in these two subjects, and there are also some students who excel in chemistry and biology, but cannot reach the absolute advantage of mathematics and physics.

Why are many people good at mathematics and physics, but not good at chemistry and biology?

Read on