Mr. K sat in the living room in a daze, his eyes glazed and his face full of despair.
Loading...
Two days earlier, the nine boxes he had sent to Debang Express full of 8-year-old belongings were all burned during transportation, and Debang Company only paid a mere 10,000 yuan. He regretted it, why did he choose this notorious courier company in the first place? At this moment, the pain in his heart is indescribable.
Mr. K's experience has undoubtedly once again aroused great concern from all walks of life about the safety of express delivery. As a young man under the age of 30, all the belongings he has accumulated in Beijing for 8 years include not only electronic products and precious documents worth tens of thousands of yuan, but also many spiritual sustenances that cannot be replicated, but now they have come to naught. In the face of Deppon Express's perfunctory attitude and insignificant compensation, Mr. K's despair and anger can be imagined.
This incident undoubtedly sounded a crisp alarm bell.
As a well-known name in China's express delivery industry, Deppon Express has such a serious cargo damage accident, and also turned a blind eye to it, perfunctory, which makes many consumers have to re-examine the safety hazards of the express delivery industry. What's even more disturbing is that similar cases are not isolated in the express delivery industry, and many customers have suffered from the loss or destruction of goods.
So, what is it that has made this so-called "best courier company in China" fall to such a point? What kind of cat is hidden behind it?
Responsibility evasion: a common problem in the express delivery industry
According to relevant reports, the tragedy that happened to Mr. K is not an isolated case. As early as 2019, many consumers complained about the spontaneous combustion accident of Deppon Express during the transportation of goods, causing serious damage to the goods, but Debang said that it was "force majeure" at that time.
In April this year, Deppon Express had a similar "spontaneous combustion" accident again, burning all the belongings that Mr. K had accumulated for many years. But what is puzzling is that Debang has shown unprecedented stinginess and prevarication on the issue of compensation. Even though 2 of Mr. K's 9 boxes were still insured, Debang was only willing to pay a mere 1,250 yuan in the end.
In this regard, Mr. K was indignant, believing that Debang Company was simply shirking its responsibilities and doing things perfunctorily. He has communicated with Debang customer service staff many times, hoping to get a reasonable solution, but in the end, he has been repeatedly delayed.
It can be said that this incident fully highlights the common problems of the express delivery industry in terms of safety and security and compensation. On the one hand, express companies often blame the damage to the goods on "force majeure" and refuse to bear the corresponding responsibility; On the other hand, even if the customer chooses the insured service, the amount of compensation is often difficult to cover the actual loss. This strange phenomenon of "more insurance, more compensation" not only makes it difficult for many consumers' rights and interests to be effectively protected, but also seriously damages the credibility of the industry.
As a well-developed express delivery industry, this phenomenon is counterintuitive. Do courier companies really only use consumers as a tool to make money? Don't they have any sense of social responsibility?
This is undoubtedly deeply disappointing and infuriating.
Security risks: Loopholes in the system need to be filled
The root cause of this problem, in addition to the problems of the express company itself, the defects of system construction can not be ignored.
First of all, in terms of safety management in the express delivery industry, the existing regulations are obviously far from sound and perfect. For example, in many links such as cargo transportation safety, warehouse management, and driver training, there is a lack of sufficient mandatory regulations and strict enforcement. This also allows some courier companies to evade responsibility and blame the accident on "force majeure".
Second, there are obvious loopholes in the current regulations in terms of compensation standards. Although the state has issued relevant regulations requiring express companies to compensate customers for losses according to a certain percentage, the actual implementation often varies, and even there are obvious unfairness. This has also led to many consumers having no way to protect their rights and can only watch their property disappear.
Thirdly, there are also certain deficiencies in law enforcement and supervision. Although the relevant departments have increased the supervision of the express delivery industry, it is often dealt with after the fact, and it is difficult to achieve timely and efficient prevention and intervention. This allows large companies that have dominated the industry for many years to squeeze consumers with impunity, regardless of the law and morality.
It can be said that if these system loopholes cannot be filled as soon as possible, the security risks of the express delivery industry will not be completely solved. In the face of an endless stream of cargo damage accidents, it is difficult for those customers who are in trouble to seek reasonable compensation.
This is not only an issue related to the healthy development of the industry, but also directly related to the vital interests of consumers.
Only by rectifying from the institutional level can the safety management and compensation system of the express delivery industry be truly improved. Only in this way can those consumers who have suffered greatly because of the brutal behavior of the courier company really get the respect and protection they deserve.
Reflection mechanism: call for the establishment and improvement of express delivery supervision
At present, in the context of frequent safety accidents in the express delivery industry, Mr. K's experience undoubtedly reflects a deeper problem: the lack of an effective regulatory mechanism in the express delivery industry.
For example, once there is a problem such as damage to goods, express companies often blindly pass the buck, delay compensation, and rarely be able to give customers a satisfactory solution. Even the media platform, which has always been good at rights protection, also encountered an inexplicable "hot search" treatment when helping Mr. K speak out, which further highlights the cattiness within the express delivery industry.
Even more troubling, this does not appear to be an isolated case. According to relevant investigations, similar express security accidents have always existed in the industry, but the vast majority of customers are ultimately difficult to obtain due compensation and compensation. This not only damages the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, but also seriously damages the credibility of the express delivery industry. Many experienced consumers will be more cautious when choosing express delivery, and even alienate those discredited large companies. This is undoubtedly a big burden on the healthy development of the industry.
Therefore, I think it is imperative to establish a sound regulatory mechanism for the express delivery industry, starting from all aspects to effectively protect the rights and interests of consumers.
First of all, in terms of safety management, the competent authorities should formulate stricter industry standards to comprehensively investigate and rectify potential safety hazards in all links. For example, express delivery companies are required to strengthen driver training, improve storage facilities, and implement safety inspections. In addition, it is necessary to establish a sound accident accountability mechanism, and once a cargo damage accident occurs, the responsible party must bear the corresponding legal and economic consequences.
Second, in terms of compensation standards, the government should introduce more fair and reasonable regulations. It is not only necessary to ensure that the compensation level of the insured service matches the actual loss, but also to set a more preferential insurance amount for some special items such as documents. At the same time, it is necessary to strengthen third-party supervision and put an end to the evasion of responsibility by express delivery companies.
Thirdly, in terms of law enforcement and supervision, the relevant departments should establish a normalized inspection mechanism to severely crack down on violations within the industry. For example, you can regularly spot check the express transportation process and deal with the potential safety hazards and compensation problems found in a timely manner. At the same time, it is also necessary to increase the smooth channels for consumers to protect their rights and ensure that their legitimate interests are protected in a timely and effective manner.
Only through the above series of measures can we truly curb the potential safety hazards within the express delivery industry and prevent tragedies like Mr. K from happening again. At the same time, it can also make those express companies that blindly pursue profit maximization truly realize the importance of safety and service.
Of course, this requires the joint efforts of government departments, industry associations and consumers. Only when all parties work together can the regulatory system of the express delivery industry be truly sound and perfect, so that every consumer can use this convenient service with peace of mind.
Finally, I also hope that Mr. K will be able to recover from this blow as soon as possible and bounce back on his feet. I believe that as long as we work together, we will be able to create a safer and fairer consumption environment for him and all express customers. Let us work together to build a more civilized and reliable express delivery industry#15万家当化为灰烬! The truth is shocking#