#别克E5小鹏G6车尾碰撞测试#
Daily positive energy, welcome to taste! This is the channel of "Daily Fast Food Station", I wish you all a prosperous era and a wide range of financial resources!
Recently, a discussion around the Buick E5 and Xpeng G6 rear crash test is boiling on the Internet, this important test aimed at testing the safety of the vehicle, but because of the test conditions set up attracted many questions, netizens have expressed their dissatisfaction and concern.
Loading...
It is understood that in this test, Buick E5 and Xpeng G6 had a rear collision, but the test conditions caused widespread controversy.
According to the details in the video, some careful netizens estimated that the collision speed was only about 30km/h, which is indeed too mild for the real collision scene in daily driving.
However, it is precisely such test conditions that have sparked strong discussions among netizens. Someone bluntly said: "This crash test is a bit simple, a little vague, how can the normal collision speed be so low." ”
Some netizens questioned: "How does this make the audience know how much speed the collision was?" "Obviously, the authenticity and representativeness of the test came into focus.
There is no lack of rational analysis in the wave of criticism of the test. "This kind of collision is not as good as two cars colliding at 60 kilometers per hour", "It's not the same altitude, the evaluation is not interesting, it can't explain the problem", netizens proposed higher test standards, hoping to see a more rigorous and realistic test environment.
At the same time, some netizens expressed confidence in the safety performance of individual models: "The safety of American cars has nothing to say", but at the same time, they also pointed out that the real competition should be conducted under fairer and more challenging conditions.
So far, there has been no official response from the test organizers or the car brands involved, but the public's call has been clear: to increase the transparency and simulation of the test, and to win the trust of consumers with scientific data and unbiased results.
While the test was controversial due to the conditions, it also prompted a re-examination of the standards and transparency of vehicle safety testing within and outside the industry.
In the future, both automakers and third-party testing organizations will need to pay more attention to the practicability and credibility of testing to ensure that consumers are provided with accurate and reliable safety performance data.
Finally, I believe that the original purpose of automotive safety testing is to protect the lives of passengers, and its standards should be strict, transparent, and as close as possible to real-world accident scenarios.
If you only test at a speed that will not be a problem, it is undoubtedly more gimmick than substance.
Future tests should listen to the voice of the public, only in this way can the vehicle's protection ability in an emergency be truly measured, and give consumers the most intuitive reference for car purchase.
It is hoped that the automotive industry can take this opportunity to move towards a higher level of safety standard formulation and practice!