Recently, a woman's remarks in the live broadcast room have aroused widespread social discussion. She bluntly said in the live broadcast that men with a monthly salary of only 3,000 yuan seemed "very incompetent" in her eyes, and this statement immediately caused huge controversy on the Internet.
During the live broadcast, the woman bluntly said, "I only complain about men who earn 3,000 in the live broadcast room, because I think that earning 3,000 is not capable, when will the salary of 3,000 give me an LV bag," and other remarks quickly aroused the dissatisfaction of netizens.
Loading...
(Video from @青豆新闻)
The anchor believes that men in this income bracket lack ability. These words immediately touched the nerves of many netizens, and many expressed dissatisfaction and disgust. After all, salary does not fully represent a person's ability and value, and such evaluation criteria seem too one-sided and mean. And in some third- and fourth-tier cities, is the salary of 3,000 yuan not at the normal level?
With the fermentation of public opinion, the police of the Cyber Security Brigade also noticed this situation. They said that the woman's behavior was actually more a reflection of her personal values. While her remarks may not represent everyone's opinions, they still have a certain level of social impact. At present, the police are in contact with the relevant departments to properly handle the matter.
Of course, netizens also turned on the mode of cynicism:
"It's just a personal statement, but it just shouldn't be said online"
"Conscientious anchors, if they don't advertise or sell goods, they just torture people"
"How to deal with the auxiliary police with a salary of 2,000"
"It's definitely not me, I'm only 2800 a month as a security guard"
Faced with more and more doubts and criticism, the woman finally stood up and responded. She explained that at that time, a male netizen in the live broadcast room asked her: "Can I chase you with a monthly salary of 3,000?" She was so excited that she mistakenly said the Shaanxi dialect "look at it" (meaning you can't understand or don't understand) as "look down", which caused everyone's misunderstanding. She stressed that her remarks were not aimed at all men with a monthly salary of 3,000 yuan, but only an immediate response to the netizen's question. I hope you don't over-interpret and misunderstand what she means.
Of course, in the face of this explanation, netizens "don't buy it". Some netizens believe that even if it is a speech in individual circumstances, we should pay attention to the appropriateness and social impact of the words. As a public figure, you should be more cautious when making remarks on a public platform such as the live broadcast room to avoid causing unnecessary controversy and misunderstanding.
Actually! For this problem, consider it from another angle, if a company only pays 3,000 yuan to its employees, then the company will also be looked down upon, is it incompetent? "I am born to be useful" Everyone will have his value, maybe their own value can not be reflected, but this is not the only criterion to measure a person's value.
We don't care if there is a problem with this anchor's speech and values, but she shouldn't say it on the Internet. The salary of 3,000 yuan is indeed a bit small in 2024, when prices are soaring, but it is not the individual who causes this result, but the whole society. If your salary is 3000, that's your problem, if your colleague is also 3000, is it the company's problem? Every company pays salaries as required, so no one should be looked down upon. There are too many miracles in this society, maybe one day the person you look down on will create a miracle?
What do you think about this? Is a salary of 3000 to be looked down upon?
(The video picture is from the Internet, if there is any infringement, contact the author to delete)