Before reading, please click a "follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
Recently, the social security center of a place proposed to replace the high bride price with the pension insurance for parents-in-law, which caused heated discussions on the whole network.
When it comes to high bride price, it has always been a cliché, and it is true that for ordinary people, it is estimated that half of a family's income is a lifetime. For example, the high-priced bride price in a western province is well known throughout the country.
According to relevant media reports, a county social security center in Hunan Province launched a proposal of "sending social security without dowry".
What does it mean, with the gradual aging of the population, and the increase of pension insurance year by year,
That is, in the future, everyone should not give a bride price, and the man will convert the bride price to the woman into endowment insurance.
In this way, the woman's parents in the future will also be protected, and they will be more at ease, more assured, and more secure!
In fact, this logic is indeed very correct, and the starting point is also very good, but I also think it is a bit weird.
Is it possible that only the woman's family can buy insurance, and the man's family does not have to buy it?
Personally, I think that the bride price collection is really not good, and it should be canceled, as long as the two of them live happily, it is better than how much bride price is given.
As for providing for the elderly, this is also an obligation and virtue that must be done for children, what do you think?
Video source: Phoenix Media
Loading...
As soon as this matter was exposed, it attracted the attention of many people, and netizens left comments to express their opinions.
This can't be refunded, but if you have a guaranteed divorce, you won't pay it for at least 15 years, which is equivalent to installments.
The bride price can be brought back, but the pension cannot. Probably even more reluctant.
Water can carry a boat and it can capsize a boat, depending on how you buy this insurance. If you pay monthly in 15 years. It's on the man's side.
Hundreds of thousands of dowries, plus houses and cars, cost lives, is there a certain west, is it true?
Isn't it fragrant for me to buy it for my own parents, why should I buy it for other people's parents? If the bride price is given, the child can afford to raise it, and if it is mixed well, it will be accepted, and if it is not mixed well, it will not get married, and it will be ready to raise his parents after he is old, and he will still be chic for a lifetime.
This is installment payment, you think, if you get divorced in time to stop the loss, if you don't divorce, you should give a little more living expenses every year, but in fact, you don't give a penny of dowry.
For most people, the bride price is still their own, but you are embarrassed.
Do you think it's right to marry your son and let your daughter-in-law buy it?
You're right, that's why it's like housing prices, rotting in the hands of developers!
Our parents farmed the land to support us, and we haven't repaid the favor, so we pay social security to support other people's parents.
So can we give some advice on the situation where our parents have been retired for many years and have a pension?
The money is in your own hands. What to make an appointment, go through the process, and wait for work.
This gap is not a little bigger, I think it is still reliable to put the mother-in-law.
It's so difficult for a man, a woman wants to harvest, and this also wants to harvest, it's too difficult for a man, and I'm not getting married anyway,
Why go through the hands of intermediaries? Isn't it okay to give it directly to the parties?
This can be had, but there must be an upper limit, in another form of comparison.