As a regular traveler, the most basic expectation when staying in a hotel is to be able to get enough security and privacy. However, recently, a "sleep horror" incident occurred in Xiangfen Homeinn in Shanxi Province, which made people question the operation and management of the hotel. Here's the thing, a woman slept completely naked according to her habit after checking into a Homeinn hotel.
At about 11 o'clock in the morning the next day, the door was suddenly brushed open from the outside! The naked woman in the room was awakened by the loud noise, and hurriedly dressed and picked up her mobile phone to prepare for an emergency. When she reached the door, she found that the door had been pushed open, but no one had entered. She immediately suspected that someone was attempting to commit an illegal act against her, so she immediately called the police for help.
However, the police refused the woman's request on the grounds that "this is a civil dispute, and the hotel and the guest can resolve it through negotiation". What's even more infuriating is that in order to find out what happened, the woman asked to see the surveillance video of the day, but was prevaricated and refused by the hotel. The hotel even asked the woman to call the police first, and then be accompanied by the police to check it, on the grounds that it was to protect privacy.
In this way, the woman and the hotel were in a stalemate for more than an hour, and finally found nothing and could only leave angrily. Afterwards, the woman posted her experience online, questioning that the hotel had a major safety hazard and did not give guests a minimum of privacy and personal protection. In just a few hours, the incident sparked a heated discussion online.
Some netizens believe that it is too bold and reckless for a woman to sleep naked in a hotel, and it is easy to cause danger to herself. Others feel that it is understandable that the hotel is kind enough to remind the check-out time. However, most netizens denounced the hotel's practice as a serious dereliction of duty and a violation of the basic rights and interests of guests.
Just when the voice of public opinion was rising, Homeinn finally responded to the matter. It turned out that the "uninvited guest" in the morning was not an outsider, but a waiter inside the hotel. At around 11:20 a.m., the employee used his service card to open the door without receiving a response from the people in the room.
However, when she opened the door and saw that the anti-theft chain was still fastened, she also realized that it might disturb the guests who were resting, so she left immediately. The hotel explained that the employee's original intention was only to remind guests that it was about to check out, and that there was no other intention, and that it was a moment of negligence that caused the "frightening incident".
In order to show its sincerity, Homeinn personally admitted the poor management in this incident, and said that it would strengthen training and education for new employees to avoid such a situation from happening again. So, which side is justified and which side is biased? We might as well look at this incident from a different angle.
First of all, the author does not agree with the habit of women sleeping naked when they go out to travel. Although it is a "private space" in a hotel room, it is still a public place, and there are certain potential risks. In the event of an accident, even if there is the fault of the hotel, as a party, it is difficult to escape the blame.
Secondly, the author believes that it is unethical for the hotel waiter to use the service card to open the room door without authorization when no one answers the door. Even if you have good intentions, you should consult with your guests first, and protecting your guests' privacy is a basic ethical work ethic in the hospitality industry.
In addition, the hotel also has a big problem with post-processing. The woman's request to see the surveillance was denied, citing excuses. Presumably, if the hotel really attaches importance to this matter, actively cooperates with the investigation and resolves the conflict in a timely manner, the subsequent online war of words can be completely avoided.
Finally, the author does not fully agree with Homeinn's response. At the end of the day, this is an incident that raises major privacy and personal security concerns, and it is not enough to blame it on "inadequate training for new employees." As a well-known hotel chain brand, Homeinns urgently needs to reflect on the management defects of internal management that is only formal, as well as the business philosophy of "profit-seeking" and neglect of service.
In general, whether it is the woman's misconduct, or the hotel waiter's and internal management mistakes, this incident has taught us that we should always be highly vigilant in public and cherish our personal safety and privacy; As a practitioner in the service industry, we should keep in mind the core concept of providing high-quality service and paying attention to details for guests, and truly win the trust of consumers with actions.
(Disclaimer: The content of this article, videos, pictures, and articles are all from the Internet, for reference only!