laitimes

153 to 10, UN voting site: The United States and Israel oppose ineffective, will Israel cease fire?

author:Whatever you want

In the solemn halls of United Nations Headquarters, a moment in history has quietly descended.

As the gavel fell, a resolution on a humanitarian ceasefire in the Gaza Strip was adopted by an overwhelming margin of 153 votes to 10, and the audience instantly erupted in thunderous applause, as if the common breath of the world had found resonance at this moment.

This was not only a victory in the vote, but also a concentrated demonstration of the international community's desire for peace and justice.

153 to 10, UN voting site: The United States and Israel oppose ineffective, will Israel cease fire?

The adoption of the resolution comes against the backdrop of the recent escalation of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, which has left more than 18,000 people dead in the Gaza Strip, homes in ruins and an unprecedented humanitarian crisis.

The eyes of the international community are focused on this, calling for an immediate end to the violence and for innocent civilians to breathe.

Although there was a brief ceasefire between the Palestinians and Israelis thanks to the efforts of many parties, after a brief period of silence, the fighting resumed, and the Gaza Strip was once again shrouded in the haze of war.

153 to 10, UN voting site: The United States and Israel oppose ineffective, will Israel cease fire?

The Israeli side insists on the need for its military action, believing it to be a reasonable response to threats from the Hamas group.

Israel's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Gil Erdan, expressed strong dissatisfaction in his statement at the General Assembly, arguing that the resolution was one-sided, ignoring Israel's security considerations, fearing that a ceasefire would only give Hamas a respite and strengthen its military capabilities.

However, his voice appeared isolated in a sea of 153 votes.

153 to 10, UN voting site: The United States and Israel oppose ineffective, will Israel cease fire?

The resolution addresses the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip and calls for an immediate ceasefire to ensure unhindered access for humanitarian assistance, while stressing the need to respect international law, in particular international humanitarian law.

Although the resolution of the United Nations General Assembly is not legally binding, it represents the collective will of the international community, and its moral force should not be underestimated.

The adoption of the resolution is undoubtedly an international condemnation of Israel's continued military operations and a deep sympathy for the suffering of the people of Gaza.

153 to 10, UN voting site: The United States and Israel oppose ineffective, will Israel cease fire?

The resolution, adopted by the United Nations, sets out three core requirements in response to the urgent humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip, with the aim of alleviating the suffering of the local population and promoting peace and stability.

Here's a closer look at the three requirements:

Immediate humanitarian ceasefire in the Gaza Strip:

This is at the heart of the resolution, which calls on all parties to the conflict to immediately cease all military operations and to create a safe environment free of violence for civilians.

The purpose of the humanitarian ceasefire is to allow emergency services safe access and to assess and respond to the basic needs of the local population, including food, water, medical assistance and emergency shelter.

The ceasefire also provides an opportunity for the evacuation and treatment of the wounded, as well as for the restoration of basic services such as electricity, water and sanitation.

The resolution stresses that the ceasefire should be unconditional, i.e. without any preconditions, in order to ensure its prompt implementation and effective mitigation of the humanitarian crisis.

153 to 10, UN voting site: The United States and Israel oppose ineffective, will Israel cease fire?

Immediate and unconditional release of all detainees:

This requirement relates to civilians, combatants and other individuals who may be detained by both parties to the conflict.

Unconditional release means ensuring respect for humanitarian principles and reducing family and social divisions, without presupposing exchange, negotiation or other political conditions.

This measure aims to alleviate the humanitarian crisis, reduce the use of hostages as bargaining chips, promote confidence-building and pave the way for possible future peace dialogue.

153 to 10, UN voting site: The United States and Israel oppose ineffective, will Israel cease fire?

Ensuring unimpeded humanitarian access:

In order to ensure timely and unhindered access to those in need, the resolution stresses the need to maintain unhindered access to all humanitarian access.

This means that all parties to the conflict must not block roads, checkpoints, or border crossings to ensure the smooth flow of relief supplies, medical equipment, food, and medicine to the Gaza Strip.

Clear access also includes providing safe passage for aid workers to carry out assessment, rescue and reconstruction work.

In addition, it requires streamlining administrative procedures, avoiding bureaucratic hurdles, and ensuring an efficient and timely aid response.

153 to 10, UN voting site: The United States and Israel oppose ineffective, will Israel cease fire?

Of particular concern is the fact that some of the measures taken by Israel during the conflict, such as the flooding of Gaza's tunnel network with seawater, are widely seen as extreme and potentially exacerbate the humanitarian crisis, further fueling the resentment of the international community.

These actions not only cross the red lines of international law, but also provoke global questioning and criticism of Israel's policies.

153 to 10, UN voting site: The United States and Israel oppose ineffective, will Israel cease fire?

In the face of such pressure from international public opinion, Israel is facing not only a military challenge, but also a diplomatic and moral test.

If Israel continues to ignore the resolution, it risks not only wider isolation in the international arena, but also long-term damage to its international standing and credibility.

The attitude of the countries of the world towards Israel, as well as future cooperation and assistance, could be affected by this.

153 to 10, UN voting site: The United States and Israel oppose ineffective, will Israel cease fire?

The disparity of 153 votes to 10 votes in this vote is not just a contrast of numbers, it symbolizes the convergence of forces for peace and justice, and solidarity with the innocent lives who have suffered so much in the conflict.

Although the road is still long and challenging, the adoption of this resolution is undoubtedly a solid step towards peace for the international community.

Just as the applause echoed in the conference room of the United Nations General Assembly, it was an affirmation of hope and an expectation of peace.

In this complex and protracted conflict, every effort to move towards peace deserves to be remembered and cherished.

Read on