Watching movies is a kind of relaxation and entertainment that most people like, but have you ever thought that some unexpected accidents may happen in the cinema? Recently, an incident in a movie theater in Huizhou, Guangdong Province has aroused widespread attention and heated discussions from all walks of life.
It is said that this is how it happened: On the day of the May Day holiday, a man and his girlfriend went to a local theater to watch a movie.
The situation at the scene immediately caused chaos. The man's girlfriend was very anxious, and hurriedly called for help and tried to pinch the acupuncture points of her boyfriend's middle man, hoping to relieve the symptoms. Seeing this, other spectators also stepped forward to help. After the theater staff learned of the situation, they immediately suspended the film to ensure the safety of other audience members.
Afterwards, some witnesses broke the news on social media. According to their descriptions, a movie called "The Siege of the Kowloon Walled City" was being shown at the time.
When there is a scene in the film where a character's finger is cut off,
In this regard, there are many voices of doubt and speculation on the Internet. Some people believe that seizures have nothing to do with the content of the movie they watch. After all, epilepsy, like any other disease, often has no pattern to seizures.
However, careful analysis can also find that although the content of the film itself is not the direct cause of epilepsy, it still increases the risk of developing it to a certain extent.
Medical research has shown that when people are in a state of tension and excitement, they are more likely to induce potential hidden diseases. And some violent, bloody and violent visual impact will undoubtedly bring a certain amount of mental stimulation to people.
However, we also need to be reasonably aware of this issue. Needless to say, the health of the person is the primary consideration. People with special diseases naturally need to pay attention to better protection of their bodies.
However, this does not mean that the freedom of creation of film and television works is restricted, and the bloody and violent plots are "banned".
It is commendable that in the face of this unexpected situation, the response of the theaters involved was very timely and decent. They immediately took corresponding emergency measures and took the initiative to assume their due social responsibilities.
According to the official report, the hospital not only arranged personnel to send the audience with sudden symptoms to the hospital for treatment, but also refunded and paid compensation for other affected audiences. It can be seen that a good sense of emergency and service concept has gradually formed a consensus in contemporary cultural enterprises.
Overall, the incident, although surprising, was eventually resolved satisfactorily. For the theater staff and management, this is undoubtedly an excellent practical experience in crisis management.
Looking forward to the future, as long as all parties can learn lessons from the incident, form a more scientific and reasonable emergency plan, and cultivate the audience's awareness of emergency avoidance, then this kind of similar "accident" will be better prevented and controlled. Of course, this also requires the participation of the whole society.