With the state's strict control over straw burning, the common people have developed two very different views on it: some oppose it, while others firmly support it. Today, I will take you to discuss the harm of straw burning and the importance of prohibiting this behavior to environmental protection and people's lives.
I remember when I was a child, the villagers would make good use of straw as winter livestock feed due to poverty. However, with the improvement of living standards and the widespread mechanization of farmland, villagers are more inclined to simply burn, especially on wet straw such as corn stalks. It can't be incinerated at all at once, and the smoke from incineration can last for several days. This not only causes air pollution, but also poses a safety hazard. I remember that in the autumn harvest season, there was a miasma of black smoke, the air quality was worrisome, and even caused a fire accident.
It is in this context that the state has had to issue a ban on burning, aiming to protect the environment from the long-term harm caused by burning straw. After the ban is implemented, I believe that in the past few years, everyone should be able to clearly feel that the air has improved significantly, and the haze has gradually decreased. At the same time, with the advancement of the country's greening process, the vegetation in the mountains and hills has been restored, and the risk of fire caused by straw burning has also increased.
In fact, the ban on burning does not deprive farmers of convenience, but rather shifts to more sustainable methods. Data shows that green straw treatment can not only reduce pollution, but also create economic value. We can't ignore the fact that the consequences of fires caused by straw burning are not still borne by the arsonists? I remember that there were fires caused by straw burning in our hometown in the past, and we were finally sentenced.
Therefore, the ban on straw burning is to protect our people, and it is not easy to make money in the countryside.