#文章首发挑战赛#
For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to see more content in time, click "Follow" We update wonderful stories and share different story moments for you every day
Text: Praise and praise are on the way
Edit|Zanzans are on the way
A "mysterious intelligence officer" in the United States recently sharply criticized the research and development process and performance level of China's H-20 stealth strategic bomber. He claimed that China's H-20 bomber had encountered major technical difficulties during its development, and that its performance was far inferior to that of the B2 stealth bomber in service with the United States, not to mention its successor, the B21. This remark undoubtedly pointed directly at the goal of the H-20 project, with the intention of suppressing the arrogance of the opponent.
However, there are reasons to question the credibility and motivation of this source. Judging from the military industrial strength of the United States, which has been making great progress since World War II, it has nothing to fear, so why should they be so wary of a project that is still under research and development? On the other hand, China's rapid development in the aerospace field in recent years has made the US defense circle feel an unprecedented threat, and this may be the root cause of their anxiety and crisis. Although the American-style trick of selling fame and reputation is old, it also highlights their deep-seated fear of China.
The US intelligence officer's remarks actually hit the focal point of the future aviation arms race between China and the United States. As the sharp blade of China's new generation of long-range strike force, the H-20 undoubtedly represents an important step forward for China to move towards a higher-level strategic air force system. Its technical indicators such as stealth, long-range, and large-load are the foundation for the United States to continue to maintain its leading position.
If the performance of the H-20 is really as "vulnerable" as this official said, the US military will inevitably breathe a sigh of relief, and it will not go to such great lengths to slander it. However, the development process of the H-20 has not been smooth sailing, and the mainland's aviation industry has repeatedly encountered many obstacles on the way to catch up with the advanced countries, but can we admit that we will surrender on this ground? These remarks of the United States have undoubtedly ignited our determination to make a breakthrough in an all-round way.
Why did this unknown US intelligence officer focus so much on and be afraid of a new Chinese weapon that was still in the research and development stage? What technical difficulties did the H-20 encounter in the development process that caused it to arouse such keen attention from its opponents? In contrast, China did not react so much when the B2 was launched, and what are the deep-seated reasons behind this? Have we caught up with and surpassed the United States in the aerospace field, so that it cannot be underestimated? Or is it just wishful thinking and arrogance? Until we solve these mysteries, we will leave the table aside for the time being and try to restore the event itself.
Recently, in an interview with the media, a US official claiming to be an intelligence officer strongly questioned the performance of the "H-20," a new-generation stealth strategic bomber being developed by China. He claimed that judging from the information currently available, the H-20 encountered major technical difficulties in the process of development, and its performance indicators were far inferior to the B2 stealth strategic bomber currently in service in the United States, and it could not be compared with the successor model B21.
As soon as this remark came out, it immediately aroused widespread attention and heated discussion in the field of public opinion. Proponents argue that the United States, as a global military power, understandably knows the military power of its adversaries. And it is true that China lags far behind the United States in some key areas. The other faction is skeptical, arguing that the United States has been playing up the threat of its adversaries in order to achieve the goal of increasing military spending. It can be said that there are certain differences between the two sides on this issue.
For China's aviation industry, in the face of the United States' doubts, it is undoubtedly a huge pressure and motivation coexist. In recent years, China has made great strides in the field of aviation, and the birth of some new fighters and drones has made the US defense community feel unprecedented pressure. However, there is still a gap between us and the United States in terms of key technologies, and large-scale projects such as the H-20 are still being tackled. It is undeniable that we face all kinds of challenges and obstacles when it comes to confronting global powers.
Looking back at history, since World War II, the United States has maintained absolute dominance in the field of aviation, and its military strength naturally derives from this advantage. Thus, the so-called "aircraft carriers" play a pivotal role in their global military strategy. As a latecomer, China has long been in a catch-up position in the high-end aviation manufacturing industry. However, in recent years, there has been a qualitative leap in the development of China's aviation industry, and the success of some cutting-edge projects has attracted the attention of the world. In the fields of stealth fighters, long-range drones, and large transport aircraft, China has gradually caught up with and surpassed the United States, making the latter feel an unprecedented sense of crisis.
In particular, with the advancement of strategic weapons projects such as the H-20, once they are successfully developed and put into actual combat, they will directly shake the US military's air supremacy in the Pacific region for many years, and then affect its global military power projection. Therefore, it is natural that the US military will pay close attention to this and try its best to suppress it.
In addition, judging by the statements of US officials, they seem to have some inside information about the development of the H-20. It cannot be ruled out that they did learn about some technical difficulties, which is why they are so focused on denigrating the H-20. This may also show from the side that although the mainland has made great progress in the field of aviation industry, it has not been able to completely jump out of the vicious circle of passive catch-up. We are still controlled by others in some key components and core technologies.
Looking to the future, if the H-20 can be successfully launched and put into actual combat on a large scale, it will greatly enhance China's long-range strike capability and completely reverse the current strategic passive situation in the Pacific and the Asia-Pacific region. It can even be expected that China will then gain the strategic initiative in the region and thus compete with the United States. Once the development of the H-20 is completely blocked, it means that China will fall into a passive defensive situation for a long time to come.
Therefore, it is necessary for us to attach great importance to the research of large-scale cutting-edge projects such as the H-20, and give sufficient support and guarantee from the strategic level. First, it is necessary to increase input, and it is necessary to give a large tilt to both funds and human resources. Second, it is necessary to strengthen international cooperation, so that more countries and regions can join it and form a majestic synergy. Third, it is necessary to further optimize the top-level design, fully mobilize enthusiasm, and at the same time rationally divide labor and cooperate to avoid duplication and waste of resources.
In short, the progress of the H-20 development has a bearing on the overall situation of China's future aerospace development. It is not only a project, but also represents a historic turning point from laggard to innovation. Persistence or not, this is no longer an option.
This incident quickly caused heated discussions among netizens on the Internet. Netizens expressed their views and opinions on this matter from different angles.
Some netizens believe that as a global military power, the United States is well aware of China's military development, and what it said may be based on real intelligence, reflecting some practical difficulties encountered in the development of the H-20. The Americans are keenly aware of the threat of China's all-out catch-up, so it is not surprising that they can frantically exaggerate and exaggerate the weaknesses of their opponents.
However, some netizens are skeptical, believing that the United States has been exaggerating China's threat for no reason in order to obtain more defense budget. What is the actual progress of the H-20 project, ordinary netizens do not know. This kind of invective may simply be motivated by the interests of certain forces.
There are also some netizens who are optimistic, believing that although China started late in the aerospace field, it has made great strides in recent years. The jealousy of the opponents and the rendering of the H-20 just illustrate its importance and potential. China's strong industrial strength and firm determination will surely break through many difficulties and finally achieve independent innovation.
In addition, some netizens put forward pertinent suggestions, believing that they should not be overly proud and should not be taken lightly. Although China has made some progress, the gap between China and the developed countries still exists. We should be humble enough to learn from and draw on advanced experience, instead of being self-absorbed. Only in this way can we keep a clear head and constantly break through bottlenecks.
Overall, U.S. officials' skepticism about the H-20 program reflects their fears and concerns about China's growing aerospace capabilities. However, this kind of untruthfulness just shows the importance of the H-20 project to enhance China's strategic strength.
There is no doubt that the development of the H-20 has not been smooth sailing, and our shortcomings in key technologies and core components, as well as the shortcomings in top-level design and strategic layout, have been stumbling blocks to its development. But this does not mean that the H-20 is doomed. On the contrary, these challenges give us the motivation to turn difficulties into motivation and pressure into motivation to move forward.
Therefore, it is imperative for us to continue to increase investment and persistently promote the H-20 and other similar projects. In this process, we should not be confused by certain insults, let alone crushed by temporary difficulties. As long as we remain determined and innovative, the future will certainly belong to us! Finally, I would like to leave the reader with a question for deep thought: How much effort does China need to make in order to truly catch up with or even surpass the United States in the field of aviation? How far are we from this goal? And how should we plan for it?