The family members of the M7 accident in Shanxi Wenjie spoke out again ----- "three Mumu".
At 23:48 on April 29, the family members of the M7 accident in Shanxi Wenjie spoke again. Two key messages are revealed in the rhetoric:
First, there are well-wishers at the scene of the car accident who "broke the window and opened the door" to save people, pay attention to its wording, break the window in the front, and open the door in the back;
Second, at the time of the accident, the three family members in the car unfortunately lost consciousness.
The family spoke out, but did not deny the previous doubts about the vehicle issue, but also hoped that everyone would not bother too much.
Netizens speculated that the family members were "publicized" by the car company?
Some netizens speculated whether the family members were "publicized" by the car company? As a car company, they don't actually need to go to public relations.
"Smart driving" has an exemption clause, and car companies do not need to go to public relations.
Because there is an exemption clause for intelligent driving, that is, Shangfang Sword, but many people don't know it.
This point of view of mine originated from a video of a car blogger I recently swiped, and I felt a lot after watching it.
I was inspired by the beautiful blogger's story of another accident.
This blogger stated in the video an accident case similar to that of Shanxi Wenjie M7.
Loading...
The same question M7, also on the high speed, crashed into the sweeper.
And this car owner, who is also a M7, is just a five-seater intelligent driving version, but it is also a rear-end collision and crashed into a road sweeper in the fast lane on the highway, but the owner is fine, and the car does not spontaneously combust.
At the critical moment, AEB did not intervene, and the intelligence was not effective.
When connecting with the blogger, the owner said that the speed was 100-110 at the time, and he suddenly encountered a sweeper in front of him, but the dust was too much to see, and the result was that the assisted driving did not work, and AEB did not intervene, so it crashed.
In this process, if the car owner can intervene in advance, the tragedy may be avoided.
It's really overturned
The traffic police ruled that the cleaning car was responsible, and M7 was mainly responsible, on the grounds that he had made a mistake in judgment and did not slow down or avoid.
After the incident, the traffic police determined the responsibility, the cleaning car was responsible, and the owner of the M7 asked the owner of the M7 to be the main responsibility, on the grounds that he made a mistake in judgment and did not slow down or avoid. The owner was not satisfied and complained to the car company about the theory, but failed.
Afterwards, the owner took a magnifying glass to look at the terms and realized that "smart driving" had an exemption clause.
Later, the owner took a magnifying glass and read the terms carefully, only to know that this question M7 actually has a disclaimer clause, called ADS general limitations.
Car companies are not responsible for accidents caused by bad weather, poor visibility, dim environment and other factors.
The meaning of the clause is that many factors will affect the performance of intelligent driving, such as bad weather, poor visibility, dark environment, etc., including the splash of water from the sprinkler truck and the dust from the cleaning vehicle involved in the two accidents, which will lead to the failure to achieve the expected function.
Therefore, whether you complain or sue, the car company can also come up with this clause to exempt from liability.
The bad news is that there is no precedent for car companies to be responsible for intelligent assisted driving.
This high-value beauty blogger also reminded everyone that in all accidents, there is no precedent for car companies to be responsible for intelligent assisted driving.
Intelligent assisted driving, the essence is "assist", "intelligence" is an adjective.
Therefore, this tells us that intelligent assisted driving, the essence is "assist", "intelligence" is the same as "far ahead", it is an adjective, don't take it as omnipotent.
In case of any emergency, take the initiative to intervene to take over the vehicle.
This blogger is also bitterly persuading everyone that intelligent driving is not omnipotent, and when encountering any unexpected situation or any potential risk road conditions, you must take over the vehicle at the first time, step on the brakes first, and exit the intelligent driving system.
Although "smart driving" is good, don't be greedy.
So, let's stop worrying about the accident of the M7. This tells us a truth: although intelligent driving is good, don't be superstitious about it. We ourselves have to be vigilant at all times to ensure driving safety.