Recently, there was a news that caused a lot of heated discussions among netizens, a young man in Beijing was detained for 10 days for helping a friend weld an iron frame for decoration in a snack bar without a license! The cause of the matter is actually very simple, the young man used to know electric welding technology, and his friend opened a snack bar and needed to decorate, so he invited him to help weld a shelf. Unexpectedly, such a simple little thing actually caused heated discussions on the Internet.
This incident seems outrageous, but from the standpoint of law enforcement, it is actually reasonable. According to the relevant regulations, individuals and units carrying out construction projects need to have corresponding licenses and qualifications. This not only ensures safety and quality, but also regulates the market order.
However, a small favor between friends should not be regarded as formal construction. Law enforcement agencies should embody the spirit of humanity and handle small matters flexibly, without having to stick to rules and regulations, so as to avoid unnecessary misunderstandings and troubles.
Looking at the incident itself, the incident occurred downstairs in the snack bar, and the scope of construction is also very limited, so there is no major danger. The boss asked a friend for help, which was a small favor.
Theoretically, only long-term or large-scale construction projects need to be rigorously certified, otherwise the quality and safety of construction will be compromised. The characteristics of this construction clearly do not fall into this category. Law enforcement officers should be flexible and not overly strict.
Whether from the perspective of legal provisions or human feelings, the handling of this case seems to be inappropriate. If no substantial damage has been caused, in principle, compulsory measures of detention should not be taken. This can lead to unnecessary misleading and adverse reactions among the population. Law enforcement agencies should pay attention to the principle of gentle law enforcement, and embody the wisdom of humane and flexible handling of matters.
There are some problems in the handling of this incident. On the one hand, small favors from friends should not be considered as formal construction, and on the other hand, the scope of construction is small and there are no risk factors, and it does not meet the conditions for strict certification.
Law enforcement officials should be flexible and not overly tough. Only by taking into account both the law and human feelings can law enforcement be truly implemented in the peace of the people and be a reasonable law enforcement recognized by the public. Otherwise, there will be many unnecessary misunderstandings and misleading in vain.
In contrast, if the law enforcement officers had taken a mild and persuasive attitude and interpreted the relevant provisions and principles without giving them too strong a sense of restraint, the negative impact of the incident would not have occurred. We must conscientiously sum up lessons and improve the way we work in law enforcement, so as to give the greatest expression of human concern. This is of good value guiding significance for maintaining social order and the trust of the masses.
While enforcing the rules and regulations, law enforcement departments should also adjust their work ideas. For some small-scale activities of the nature of daily life assistance, the authority to deal with them may be appropriately delegated, and the basic level backbone personnel should carry out necessary guidance and education after understanding, rather than adopting administrative punishment measures across the board.
At the same time, law enforcement authorities can also draw up a certain gray list to clarify which situations can be regarded as daily life help, which can be appropriately sidelined, and which situations need to be further investigated and verified because of the broader impact involved.
In addition to avoiding unnecessary disputes, this can also promote the interaction between grassroots workers and the masses. Once a similar situation occurs, grassroots personnel can learn more through dialogue and give corresponding guidance, instead of imposing administrative penalties on the spot.
This will facilitate the resolution of the problem and the elimination of misdirection. At the same time, people tend to be more proactive in explaining what is going on, which is also very helpful for information communication.
Of course, there should also be a careful balance when setting grey lists. On the one hand, we must not allow all kinds of behaviors that could endanger safety to "enter the door", and on the other hand, we must leave enough room for flexibility to deal with different situations according to local conditions. This requires constantly summing up experience in law enforcement practice, absorbing public feedback, and ensuring the operability and applicability of the list.
With the passage of time, through sincere and trusting dialogue with the public, it is believed that the understanding of law enforcement and the public in this regard will become more and more unified. This will not only avoid unnecessary contradictions, but will also be conducive to promoting the better implementation of social order.