Car accidents are fiercer than tigers, and every time we see a car accident happening, we can't help but feel sad and sorry from the heart. On April 26, 2024, a Huawei Wenjie M7 was burned in a car accident on a highway in Shanxi, which attracted the attention of countless people, and it is very unfortunate that this car accident caused three people to lose their lives. While we deplore, we are also concerned about the most important question, what is the cause of the car accident, and which party is more responsible?
I believe many people have seen the relevant video, a woman said after the car accident that her younger brother and child were burned to death in the car, and her husband was rescued from the car in the hottest way, but he also died on the spot. In addition, the woman also recounted that the airbags did not open at the time of the crash, the active brakes did not activate, and the road maintenance vehicle did not set a warning.
After the accident, AITO issued a statement, saying that at the time of the accident, the car was traveling at 115 km/h, the airbags were also deployed normally, and the characteristics of the power battery pack were normal. To explain here, AITO is the foreign name of the question, which belongs to the Cialis company, but it should be noted that the company can only be regarded as a third-tier car company before cooperating with Huawei.
Two days later, Wenjie once again stated that the car involved in the accident was an entry-level non-intelligent driving version, and it was not equipped with Huawei's high-end intelligent driving assistance system, but a Bosch solution. So this statement seems to many people to be more like throwing the pot, which means that if you use Huawei's high-end intelligent system, can you avoid car accidents? Many netizens are also dissatisfied with this, what is needed at this moment is to take responsibility, not to shirk responsibility, and lack of responsibility cannot be regarded as an excellent enterprise.
However, Bosch immediately explained that the vehicle was not equipped with the Bosch Intelligent Driving System. In a car accident, whether it is a car company or an industrial technology company, instead of reflecting on their own shortcomings, they are shirking each other's responsibilities, which is really unreasonable.
In other words, what they published was that the accident had nothing to do with the vehicle itself or the system, so does the implication mean that there was a problem with the driver? In addition, according to Bosch's intelligent driving AEB concept, the emergency braking system will only be triggered at speeds of 4 to 85 km/h.
There is also a relatively big controversy is the problem of the car door, people in the rescue, can not open the door from the outside, so for the rescuers outside the car, whether it is smashing the door or using other methods, it will delay the rescue time to a certain extent. However, the question was not mentioned in the statement.
Finally, there is the problem of the sprinkler truck, whether it is normal for this kind of vehicle to appear at high speed, whether it is normal to appear in the overtaking lane, and whether there is a job warning? As we all know, if the vehicle has a rear-end accident, then a large part of the responsibility lies with the rear car, which is the general traffic common sense. In fact, car accidents sometimes occur for many reasons, and this M7 involves intelligent driving.
So it's a bit more complicated during the investigation. But at the end of the day, no matter how smart a car is, it still needs people to drive it. So again, I hope everyone must be cautious in the process of driving a vehicle, do not have any negligence and carelessness, for the sake of others and for yourself, please drive safely. What do you think about this?