With the continuous development of China, the game between the two countries continues to intensify, and the confrontation has gradually taken on the characteristics of "hybrid" warfare, for example, US Secretary of State Blinken and Yellen have recently visited China one after another, which is an attempt by Washington to achieve its economic, trade, and political goals by diplomatic and military means. #MCN首发激励计划#
As far as Yellen is concerned, during her visit to China, she urged China to "de-capacity", especially to "reduce production capacity" in the field of green energy industry, which is very unfavorable to China and very unreasonable: China develops traditional industries, and you say that China pollutes, causing global warming; China develops new energy, and you say that there is overcapacity, and you demand that China "pause", do you still have to face it? Do you have to give China a path of development? You can't let you the United States do everything, and if you stagtagnation, China will fall behind.
As far as Blinken is concerned, although Blinken seems to have failed to be angry with China due to Wang Yi's "warning" and diplomatic secrecy, it should be pointed out that on the eve of Blinken's visit to China, the US State Department announced the "three major goals" of the trip: first, to make progress on key issues, second, to clearly and directly communicate concerns about bilateral, regional and global issues, and third, to manage competition responsibly so as not to lead to miscalculations or conflicts. If you look at these "three goals" alone, Blinken's trip is definitely "not a good comer".
As far as the first goal is concerned, it is nothing more than to implement the interests of the United States, make progress in the areas where the United States wants to make breakthroughs, and show an "impatient" attitude toward China; while the second goal is nothing more than to express concern about the conflict in the South China Sea and Russia-Ukraine, to express "dissatisfaction" with Sino-Russian economic and trade relations, and to hope that China will "respect" the Philippines and "give up" Russia; and the third goal is actually to make China reassure China after making so many concessions and sacrifices, hoping that China will not "go violent" Otherwise, once China reacts violently, it will put the "irresponsible" hat on China's head.
Of course, judging from the current situation, Blinken seems to be unable to "go crazy" and was "crushed to death" by Foreign Minister Wang Yi, but we can't be so optimistic, after all, on the eve of Blinken's visit to China, Biden is "advancing in four directions" against China and "playing the front" for Blinken. The 4 routes are:
(1) The United States and Japan held a high-profile summit with the goal of China;
(2) Biden reiterated in a high-profile manner that he would protect Japan with nuclear weapons;
(3) The largest upgrade of the U.S.-Japan alliance in 60 years, deepening U.S.-Japan military cooperation and strengthening the coordinated offensive and defensive capabilities of the two militaries;
(4) U.S.-Philippine military exercises, deploying intermediate-range missile systems near China.
Therefore, let's say that Blinken's visit to China is not so simple, he came by stepping on the "drumbeat of war", he has just finished his visit to China, and the US-Philippine "shoulder to shoulder" South China Sea exercise has come to an end.
The White House's upgrade of the US-Japan military alliance, US-Philippine military exercises, and the deployment of intermediate-range missile systems in Luzon are all military actions aimed at China; Yellen and Blinken's visit to China to "give big gifts" (make requests) is a diplomatic means, and the purpose to be achieved, such as allowing China to "reduce production capacity" and give up its advantages in green energy, is also an economic and trade issue, but in the final analysis, it is to contain China's rise and ensure that US hegemony will not decline, which is also a political purpose.
Therefore, the Sino-US "melee" has indeed begun, the confrontation is "all-round", and the military, economic, diplomatic, and political "blossoms" in an all-round way.