Recently, a Nanjing citizen was fined 50 yuan by the traffic police for riding a bicycle without a license, which caused widespread controversy on the Internet. Subsequently, the relevant departments intervened in the investigation and decided to revoke the fine decision and punish the traffic police involved.
Loading...
This incident reflects the different levels of public awareness of relevant laws and regulations from different perspectives, as well as the differences between law enforcement entities and netizens in their views on law enforcement behaviors, and also makes relevant departments re-examine the rationality and meticulousness of traffic management regulations.
Netizens are hotly discussed
Netizens think: Punishment addiction is the same as stealing addiction, it will be addictive, and if you don't issue a ticket for a day, you will feel uncomfortable, which has nothing to do with law enforcement violations, and has something to do with hobbies!
Netizens said: This kind of person does not learn and has no skills, and he doesn't even understand basic legal knowledge, how can he become a people's policeman and embarrass the Nanjing police, and I hope to deal with it seriously.
Netizen spicy comment: Pay attention to the stroller at home, you must let the baby take a driver's license, otherwise it will be the turn of the stroller to be fined next!!
Netizens said: It is a very terrible thing for people who do not understand the law to enforce the law.
Netizens said: Everyone has the right of way, right, people don't even have the right to choose transportation to travel, how can it be fair and just?
Write at the end
Different views reflect that citizens' awareness of laws and regulations related to traffic management is not uniform, which also exposes the inadequacy of law enforcement in the process of law enforcement, and it is necessary to strengthen governance and publicity. As professional law enforcement personnel, they should pay attention to the basic right to know of the parties to law enforcement, choose appropriate law enforcement methods, and give them the opportunity to explain, rather than directly issuing punishment decisions. The relevant regulations themselves also need to be clear and unambiguous, and the penalties for some mixed departments should be appropriately suspended, so as not to cause unnecessary social impact.
In this case, some jurists pointed out that citizens' understanding and mastery of laws and regulations directly affect the credibility and effectiveness of law enforcement. Law enforcement agencies should strengthen publicity and education on relevant laws and regulations to raise the level of public awareness. At the same time, it is also important to improve the quality of law enforcement personnel, enforce the law meticulously, and pay attention to procedural rationality. A mature society governed by the rule of law requires mutual understanding between citizens and law enforcement agencies to jointly maintain traffic order.
In general, this incident has triggered discussions on the public's awareness of laws and regulations, the meticulousness of law enforcement, and the rationality of relevant policies from multiple perspectives. As the department that files the case, the traffic police should sum up lessons and pay attention to procedural rationality and citizens' right to know in law enforcement operations.
At the same time, the relevant departments should also strengthen the clarity of the content of the regulations and give appropriate explanations in case of disputes, and do not arbitrarily pursue individual incidents, so as not to cause doubts again. It is only through the joint participation and understanding of citizens and law enforcement agencies that a fair and efficient law enforcement system can be built.
What do you think about this matter? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss