Recently, a news about Huawei's mobile phone customer service center using a magnifying glass to find scratches on mobile phones and refusing to guarantee them on this ground caused an uproar on the Internet. It is reported that a consumer's Huawei mobile phone had the problem of the folding screen unfolding smoothly during the warranty period, but when he came to the Huawei customer service center with the mobile phone, he was told that he could not enjoy the warranty service because there was a one-millimeter scratch on the mobile phone.
Loading...
This incident quickly aroused widespread social concern and discussion. Many consumers say that mobile phones, as electronic products for daily use, will inevitably have slight scratches, which is too harsh as a reason to refuse the warranty. What's more, consumers buy high-end folding screen mobile phones, and they have higher requirements for the smoothness of the screen and the sensitivity of creases. Nowadays, the loss of warranty eligibility due to tiny scratches undoubtedly makes consumers question Huawei's after-sales service.
It is understood that the consumer was not told that scratches would affect the warranty when he bought the phone, but encountered such a dilemma when seeking the warranty. This makes people wonder whether Huawei treats consumers unfairly in after-sales service, and whether the magnifying glass is reasonable?
In today's increasingly important consumer rights and interests, the quality of after-sales service of enterprises often becomes an important consideration for consumers to choose brands. As a well-known technology company in China, Huawei's products and services have always been favored by consumers. However, the "magnifying glass damage assessment" incident has brought a lot of negative impact on Huawei's brand image.
Some commentators have pointed out that when providing after-sales service, enterprises should pay more attention to the actual experience and needs of consumers, rather than being overly entangled in subtle defects. A one-millimeter scratch has no material impact on the overall performance and use of the phone, and denying the warranty on this ground obviously ignores the legitimate rights and interests of consumers.
At the same time, some voices believe that Huawei's move may be due to strict control of product quality and after-sales service. However, even so, consumers should be clearly informed of the relevant warranty terms before the sale to avoid unnecessary disputes in the after-sales process.
This incident has not only aroused consumers' attention to Huawei's after-sales service, but also prompted people to think about the after-sales service standards of the entire electronics industry. In the highly competitive market environment, how to balance product quality and consumer rights and interests, and how to provide more humanized and efficient after-sales service is undoubtedly a topic worthy of in-depth discussion.
As the incident continues to ferment, Huawei has not yet made a positive response to the matter. However, regardless of the outcome, this incident is a wake-up call for Huawei and other electronics companies: while pursuing product quality, we must not ignore the reasonable demands and rights and interests of consumers.
What do you think of Huawei's "magnifying glass damage assessment" approach? How do you think enterprises should balance product quality and consumer rights when providing after-sales service? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss and like and support your views!
The time, process, and pictures of the article are all from the Internet, and the article aims to spread positive energy, and there is no vulgar and other bad guidance. If there is a dispute about the authenticity of this article, copyright or image infringement, please contact the author in time, and we will delete it.