With the continuous expansion of urban vehicles, the parking space resources in the community are becoming increasingly scarce. In many communities, there are also disputes between owners due to parking spaces. Recently, a case from Guiyang has attracted widespread attention.
Loading...
Here's how it happened. The owner of the community found that a car had been parked in the underground parking space of the community for several days. He informed the owner of the car several times, but the other party not only ignored it, but also took a threatening attitude. The owner had to find a property to coordinate, but the other party repeatedly passed the buck. He then called the police, but the police said they could not directly intervene in such civil disputes.
Faced with such an unfair situation, the owners chose to act on their own. He called in the team and welded a fence around the parking space, directly "cracking" the parking dispute. However, this did not stop the matter. Later, Mr. A learned that the owner of the car who occupied the parking space kept asking about him behind his back, and even intimidated others.
The owner's move sparked widespread sympathy on the Internet. Many netizens expressed their understanding and support for his approach of "returning colors". Because he is really in a weak position before the law. The police were ineffective, the property ignored it, and he had no other way to do it.
Looking for Ji Yunhao, is there anything that Secretary Ji can do?
Call a tow truck yourself, tow it away, throw it in the parking lot of the airport station, dozens of dollars an hour, and let him pay the fee
What's the use of this??? isn't it your own time that is delayed?
More important, however, is that this case shows us a problem of the times. It is a fact that urban parking resources are tight, but the selfish and unreasonable behavior of individual drivers also exacerbates this contradiction to a certain extent. Other people's parking spaces are not rented for a long time, and the property cannot be allocated to other people's property at will. But some people just refuse to buy parking spaces and occupy others arbitrarily, which will eventually lead to greater conflicts.
In fact, if you can buy a parking space, you can respect others if you can't buy it, which is the simplest truth. Nowadays, the social order is chaotic and there are constantly loopholes in law enforcement, and it is inevitable that some people will be arrogant and do not take the law seriously. But each of us should do our part and not cause unnecessary distress to others. Only in this way can similar accidents be effectively contained.
At present, the relevant actions of the owner do not constitute an illegal act. It remains to be seen whether others will take further action. The community has also been questioned whether they should take more responsibility, which is also worth watching. It is believed that with further investigation and trial, the facts of the case will be fairly and reasonably decided. But more importantly, each of us should reflect on how to achieve parking space sharing and order to avoid similar disputes.
In short, this incident deserves more deep thought. It not only exposes the selfishness of individuals, but also reminds us that we should uphold fairness and justice. Only by pointing out a direction through one's own behavior can one create a relatively harmonious community environment. This is perhaps the best reference to this case.