First, the name of the project is confusing
At the beginning of the project, the name of the project must be clarified and unified according to the construction information of the construction unit. At the first regular supervision meeting, it should be clearly stated and recorded in the meeting minutes to ensure that the name is consistent when the follow-up materials are collated.
Housing Construction Safety Information 2021 Edition Full Set of Practical Courses_Cha Xiaoyou
Second, the use of parts labeling is not uniform
It is recommended to indicate the number of layers, elevation, axis and component names at the same time, especially the number of layers, so as to facilitate the positioning of parts and data reference.
3. Inconsistencies in the data
In the process of data collation, personnel in each position should regularly summarize data, find problems in time and rectify them, ensure the correspondence and consistency between data, and avoid conflicts in the later stage.
4. Missing and redundant information
Ensure the completeness of the data and avoid missing key information such as pre-check records and intermediate check records. At the same time, care should be taken not to add unnecessary information, such as opening appraisal, etc., which is only carried out for specific concrete grades and types.
Fifth, multi-unit project data confusion
For projects containing multiple unit projects, the data should be strictly separated, especially the key information such as concealed engineering inspection records and water test records, which shall not be combined. A small amount of consolidated material information should be clearly classified into a unit project, and the storage location should be indicated in other unit projects.
Sixth, the test report is not standardized
The test report should be clear and unambiguous, and the test conclusion should be specific to the number of layers and components, and avoid general statements. In the event of a non-conforming report, it should be verified whether there is a double sampling report, and if not, the cause should be identified.
7. Insufficient preparation of the originals
Key project information, such as the quality acceptance record of the branch project, the opening and completion report, etc., shall be provided in the original at the time of filing. It is recommended to prepare at least three additional originals in addition to the number required by the contract in case of emergency.
8. Seal at will
The seal should be strictly implemented in accordance with the regulations, and important documents such as drawings and review minutes, opening and completion reports should be stamped with the company's official seal, not the project seal. Special attention should be paid to the seal of the factory certificate, and the official seal of the project does not represent the original.
9. The signature is not clear
The responsibility of signing should be clear to the person, such as the division of the project acceptance form, the survey unit, the design unit should sign the acceptance opinion of the corresponding division, and indicate the quality of the signatory, the identity of the technical leader. Important documents such as foundation groove inspection records also need to be signed and stamped by the survey unit.