laitimes

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

author:Snow talks about history

Because Li Shangyin has always been a regular main player, Liu Yong is a rotation player. Yuan Zhen is the first substitute. And in the reserve team, there are more than 3 people of the level like Song Zhiwen in the volume.

Can't make the above big coffees, Yan a few don't recognize it?

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

The subtle words are meaningful, the narrative is profound, and after PK, Nalan's works are a little twisted.

Give another example of one who misses his wife.

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

Just ask you, how to roll?

I don't mean to look down on Nalan at all, it's just that the current Chinese textbooks include works according to the standard of pinching, like the Wanyue faction and Li Qingzhao, Li Yu and other great gods I haven't brought out yet.

The gods can't arrange it, so he can be a mortal with peace of mind.

The following is a table of the top 72 in the online audition.

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

Give 1 more chance to play the repechage? Which one do you think he can play?

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

After entering the round of 32, the top god of a certain group.

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

The top half of the knockout round.

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

Lower Half Ward......

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

There is a very serious problem with the current textbooks of mainland languages: the quality of literary content is too high, especially in the field of ancient literature.

As a result, students are constantly immersed in the extremely high quality of the text, and it is commonplace to think that it is superb. If you have not been exposed to low-quality works, you will become numb to the ability to distinguish between good and bad. So much so that the following poems will be treated as ordinary works.

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

In other words, if you see a modern work of average quality in the online poetry circle, will you have an urge to correct, revise or rewrite it?

Therefore, I ask the Chinese textbook to include Nalan Ruorong's works as soon as possible, and I raise my hands in favor.

As for saying that he is very popular, probably because he is upset, right?

To use a simple analogy. In the 80s, there was a sudden "poetry fever", and the most out-of-the-circle at that time were the Xi faction and the Wang faction. However, in the field of professional literature, these two are not ranked at all. In particular, Wang Guozhen, who is a faction, has always been questioned in serious circles.

It is not his morality that is questioned, but the fact that he does not recognize his work as poetry, but proverbs. Wang Guozhen is not a poet worthy of the name.

And so on and so forth, as well as Changyang Gyatso.

From the perspective of eyeballs, there are many elements that a person needs to be unpopular with. The reason why Gyatso is famous is mainly because of his identity as a living Buddha: temple figures, birth dignitaries, monk romances, contrast poets, and any one of them today can detonate traffic.

The same goes for Nalan.

Purely in terms of literary quality, only counting the Qing Dynasty, he is not ranked 3.

However, why is he so popular? In fact, it is also a blessing of countless identities that have nothing to do with literature: the second generation of the wang family, the young man's ambition, the close servant of the Son of Heaven, the experience of abuse, and the 21-year-old Jin Shi Dengdi, if you put it in today's online dramas, they are all tailor-made male labels. Most importantly, these are historical facts.

If you look back at the most popular online dramas and online articles now, which male one is not a famous family, a young talent, holding authority, or inextricably linked with the temple, plus a main line of abuse with a woman who breaks through many difficulties?

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

How can such a character not be welcomed by Xiaowenqing?

How can such a character not be sympathized with by a little girl?

Such a character is completely a limited template for the ancient puppet male one.

Since the Qing Dynasty, the professional figures who have given positive comments on Nalan's works have only one Wang Guowei!

But the problem is that this is just the king's words.

It is far from being recognized in the literary circle, and compared with Su Xinzhi for Song Ci and Li Du for Tang poetry, Nalan is far from being the first literary place in the Qing Dynasty.

Wang Guowei also said:

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

This evaluation is groundless, and he wants to highlight the queen to slander Song Ci excessively, which is obviously a lie.

Southern Song Dynasty Death Phrase?

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

Haven't you heard of it? Okay, you've heard that before, right?

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

What's even more ridiculous is that "many" is still the first famous sentence recommended by Wang Guowei's monograph "Words in the World". Isn't this a self-defeating face?

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

And Wang said that there are five generations of famous sentences, and he can't find them himself, and only the following one is included:

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

Whether it is quality, output or popularity, the Southern Song Dynasty has beaten five generations.

In fact, this is Wang Guowei's old routine.

In order to praise Su, his monograph did not include a single work by Xin Qiji.

In order to elevate Nalan, he did not hesitate to wipe the two songs cleanly.

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

It means that all the nouns of the two Song Dynasty such as Li Qingzhao, Liu Yong, Lu You, Jiang Kui, Yang Wan X, Liu Chengweng, etc. are parallel goods.

You may say: He is only in the sense of sincerity. However, even if you take only one item, come and come:

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

Are you sure Nalan can win?

Therefore, this is just a trick by Wang Guowei to step on one hand.

From a professional point of view: Nalan's shortcomings are obvious.

Peeling out the factors of the textbook's own tendency to be bold and light-hearted, and the level of the idea, only from the perspective of literary skills, it is: famous sentences and mediocre articles.

Take the most famous "if life is only as first seen" as an example, the whole word is 8 paragraphs, only this sentence is super first-class, and the rest is really average. And it is gradually declining, slowly and quietly. This sentence can completely replace the entire work.

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

And the similar "Linjiang Immortal" only provides 1 super first-class sentence, but the level of the whole article is online, and it is presented to the world in an overall structure, while "Magnolia Flower Order", people are more accustomed to using his solitary sentences.

Think back to the true Graceful masterpiece:

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

1. The two famous sentences do not affect the shaping of the overall structure.

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

Then find a contemporaneous "unknown author".

Why are there almost no works by Nalan Rongruo in Chinese textbooks? Isn't he very popular?

In terms of literary quality, it completely hangs Nalan. The reason: consistency, clarity and lyrical naturalness. Instead of the "Magnolia Flower Order", one storm and ten cold, one white cover ten ugliness.

And this "not famous Zhu Yizun" is recognized as an important figure among the Qing Dynasty lyricists.

If Li Bai changes his name to Li Erniu, he will still be a poet and the first person.

If Nalan Rongruo changes his name to Nalan Erniu, let alone the professional circle, a group of netizens on the Internet who boast of their freshness in literature and art and shout for Nalan will basically not use his poems to frame themselves.

Parallel goods are parallel imports.