Recently, when young people take the train, "the curtain on the lower bunk is not allowed to sit", which has aroused widespread discussion in the society.
The cause of the incident was an elderly man who posted a video complaint: "We want to take a look, look at the young people, this curtain is still hung on the train, and the elderly in their 70s are not even allowed to sit." ”
As can be seen from the video, in the hard sleeper car, two young people hung a white curtain on the lower bunk, creating a more private space for themselves. It was this move that made the aunt unbearable, she wanted to sit in the lower bunk bought by others, but as soon as the curtain was hung up, she had no place to sit, so she was dissatisfied with the accusation, and found the conductor to reason.
But after the conductor came over, he felt that there was nothing wrong with the young man's approach, which made the old man even more angry, and then there was a scene of sending a video to the media to complain.
The incident fermented rapidly on the Internet, and CCTV News spoke out:
Legal experts: The right to use the seat or berth is limited to the passenger who purchased the ticket, and the passenger with the lower berth has the right to make reasonable use of the purchased position and space without affecting the normal rest and use of others.
Just two sentences can be said to set the tone for the event, there is nothing wrong with the young man's approach, the old man just has no right to sit on other people's bunks, but needs to be allowed by others!
Expert Voice:
The above is the legal expert invited by CCTV to speak, and the next expert to speak out on this incident is: Chen Yinjiang, deputy secretary general of the Consumer Rights Protection Law Research Association of the China Law Society.
Chen Yinjiang said that it is recommended that the railway department consider the actual needs of consumers of different ages, design a more humanized and comfortable riding environment, and respect the needs of young people for personalized and private space.
At the same time, experts suggest that everyone respect each other, understand each other, consider the actual situation of the elderly, and if young people do buy the lower berth, they are also encouraged to change places with the elderly and provide them with some help and convenience.
Netizens who spoke out against experts reacted strongly:
Hebei netizens said: Don't kidnap passengers morally, don't let passengers without seats sit down and rest for a while when the business seats are empty, and if you want to provide convenience for the elderly, the railway department should come up with a plan, not let the passengers bear it.
Migrant workers who can't buy tickets have never said to let them go to the sleeper to sit there, and it's empty.
Why doesn't the train offer bunks to the elderly for free?
The purchase of the lower bunk is also bought by young people with additional money, so why does morality kidnap young people? Our money is not blown by the wind, and we have the right to use it legally.
There are even netizens who are tough experts: Everyone is working, how about we exchange wages? Take care of our laborers!
There are also people who complain, "brick" family talents! I can take the initiative to let it, but you can't suggest that I let it!
The young man who hung the bed curtain on the sleeper responded:
When she got into the car, the old man was already sitting in her lower bunk, and there were many seats in the corridor at that time, but the old man did not choose to sit in the hallway. He took the initiative to try to communicate with the old man, but the old man was aggressive and refused to respond.
The old man left when she began to hang the curtains, and then scolded herself and her companions in the corridor of the carriage, and called the conductor.
But the conductor said that they could hang without disturbing others, and then the old man continued to insult them and attacked the conductor.
The young man said that he and his companion's bed curtains were hung separately and did not occupy the entire space of the lower bunk, and they also paid attention to the space left for the footrests when hanging the bed curtains.
There is something to say:
In fact, many elderly people responded that they did not need young people to change places with themselves, and if they did not buy a lower berth, they would not choose to travel at all.
There are also many young people who react that if the old man has a better attitude, and she is really in need, rather than being unreasonable, then it is not impossible for her to change positions. But it is very offensive for experts to give this advice, it is their duty to let it be their own love, and there is still the problem of price difference, after all, no one's money is blown by the wind.
When we are away, we will all try to help others and pass on a love to everyone, so that more people will be willing to lend a hand when we are in need.
To sum up, whether to give or not to let should be based on the understanding and consensus of both parties, and it is by no means a moral kidnapping by one party, relying on the old and selling the old to force demands, what do you think?