Recently, who will pay back the empty account of the pension "deemed payment"?
Many people don't understand what this pension "deemed payment" means, let me explain to you: this sentence is mainly for the retired elderly in the 660-70s, before the implementation of the national pension insurance system, the working years of employees can be regarded as having paid pension insurance.
This is mainly in that era, the state has not yet implemented the pension insurance system, and when it is implemented, the elderly in that era are already facing the age of retirement, and some of the pension insurance is directly not enough years.
In order to ensure that the old people of that era receive reasonable compensation and recognition for their years of service before the implementation of the old-age insurance system, the state has directly formulated the stipulation that the pension is regarded as payment, so that as long as the old man of that era reaches the age of retirement, the calculation base of his pension will be calculated from the time he starts working, and the unpaid pension expenses will be directly paid by the state!
However, the implementation of this policy involves the problem of an empty account, and how is this empty account formed? That is, the actual unpaid expenses before the implementation of pension insurance, because this expense is reimbursed by the state, so there is an empty bill.
Recently, some experts suggested that state-owned enterprises should reduce salaries, private enterprises should reduce their rates, and everyone should repay the empty bills of "deemed payment"!
Why should state-owned enterprises repay it? Because all the workers in those days belonged to state-owned enterprises, and private enterprises basically did not have them, and this fee was owed by state-owned enterprises to these old people back then, and now that those old people are old, state-owned enterprises should bear this cost. You can't always work hard for the old people for the enterprise, and the relevant enterprises can't just leave them behind when they get old!
Loading...
Professor Yang pointed out that the contributions made by the older generation of the elderly must be recognized, and it is impossible for them to make up for the expenses of these decades, because everyone also knows that the pension insurance has not been implemented at that time.
After the incident was put on the Internet, netizens had a heated discussion in the comment area:
The previous generation let the current people pay it back?
Not all state-owned enterprises are tobacco and oil, and the wages of many state-owned enterprises participating in market competition are not high at all, don't beat them to death with a stick!
The wages of ordinary employees are low enough, whether it is a state-owned enterprise or a private enterprise, how can low-level employees be rich?
The bosses and employees of the year have long since retired, and the salary is cut for the current people to bear?
Summary: The opinions of netizens are the business of the people of that era, because of the times, things have long been wrong, and now this compensation has to be borne by the current people, which is a bit unreasonable, in fact, I personally suggest that state-owned enterprises should bear it, but should not reduce employee wages, but should take out part of the annual profits of state-owned enterprises to compensate. That's fair!
For the pension is regarded as a contribution, if it is you, are you willing to reduce your salary to compensate?