Once upon a time, Lenovo was a leader in China's technology industry, winning the hearts of countless consumers with its rugged computer products. However, time has passed, and now Lenovo is facing an unprecedented dilemma. When Lenovo is not seen in the computer procurement list of government agencies announced by the state, it can't help but make people want to ask: What happened to Lenovo?
All this may be glimpsed from the sentence of Yang Yuanqing, the helmsman of Lenovo, "Lenovo is a world company, not a Chinese company". This sentence sparked a huge controversy at the time, causing many people to question Lenovo's identity and position. As a technology company, Lenovo seems to have never really solved the bottleneck problem of core technology for so many years, and its computer technology is mostly "take-it-or-leave-it", lacking independent research and development and innovation.
In the context of the Sino-US science and technology war, Lenovo's various performances do not seem to have won the hearts of the Chinese people. If Lenovo can face the sanctions like Huawei and show the responsibility and backbone of Chinese companies, perhaps the public's evaluation of Lenovo will not be so low.
However, the reality is always cruel. Now, the state has taken action to remove Lenovo from the list of government procurement, which is undoubtedly a huge blow to Lenovo. As China is its largest market, what does it mean for Lenovo to lose this cake? This is a question that Lenovo must deeply reflect.
In stark contrast, Huawei's four CPUs: Kunpeng 920, Pangu M900, Kirin 9006C, and Kirin 990 have all passed security certifications and are on the list of government procurement. This fully demonstrates the country's trust in Huawei in terms of information security. Huawei's rise is not accidental, but the result of years of independent R&D and continuous innovation.
Looking back on the development history of Lenovo and Huawei, it is not difficult to find a truth: only enterprises that truly master core technologies and adhere to independent innovation can be invincible in the fierce market competition. The loss of Lenovo and the rise of Huawei are vivid illustrations of this truth.
In the face of the current predicament, will Lenovo be able to learn from it and regain its strength? But in any case, we hope that China's science and technology enterprises can truly master the core technology, continue to innovate, and contribute to the country's scientific and technological progress and industrial development.
In this era of rapid technological change, we cannot stand still, let alone pin our hopes on "take-it-or-leave-it". Only independent research and development and continuous innovation are the way out for Chinese technology enterprises. At the same time, we also hope that more Chinese technology companies will adhere to independent innovation and embark on their own development path, just like Huawei.
Today, when national security issues are closely linked with science and technology, the importance of independent research and development is self-evident. From the loss of Lenovo to the rise of Huawei, we have seen the exploration and struggle of Chinese technology companies on the road of independent innovation. This is a path full of challenges and opportunities, but only by moving forward bravely can we win the glory of the future.
Today, we stand at the crossroads of history, looking forward to a new dawn for Chinese technology companies. Let us work together to contribute to the country's scientific and technological progress and industrial development!
Finally, I would like to ask: What do you think about the different situations of Lenovo and Huawei? How do you think Chinese technology companies should embark on a development path of independent innovation? I look forward to your views and opinions.