It wasn't until I saw the aunt angrily reprimanding "young people are not allowed to sit on the lower bunk of the sleeper", that I understood the true meaning of the sentence "It's not the old man who has become bad, but the bad guy who has become old"!
For young people, if I buy this ticket, then the bed bunk belongs to me, so no matter how I toss, it is my right.
But for this aunt, the lower bunk belongs to the public area during the day, and you can sit casually, regardless of whether there is anyone on it, and whether the people in the lower bunk want to lie down and rest, in short, the lower bunk during the day belongs to the public area, and if you don't let you sit, young people don't talk about martial arts.
With the fermentation of the incident, netizens are also divided into two factions, so does the lower bunk belong to themselves? or does it belong to everyone? Let's see what the central media said!
According to a report by Hongguan News on April 15, on a certain train, an aunt angrily scolded the young people in the lower bunk and hung the curtain on the lower bunk, causing them to be unable to sit, thinking that this is not what contemporary young people should look like, and they don't know how to respect the old and love the young, so let the elderly in their 70s stand there.
After the video fermented, netizens were also divided into two factions:
These netizens feel that there is nothing wrong with the aunt's approach:
"It's just unreasonable, when is the lower berth not allowed to sit? The lower berth is a public seat during the day."
"It's obvious that young people have become bad now, they have been on the train for half their lives, and it's the first time they have encountered this kind of thing, and now young people are really selfish to the extreme, will such people give up their seats to the elderly on the bus and subway?"
"Forget about sleeping at night, it's really bad for public morality to be like this during the day, dozens of hours of trains, you don't let you sit in the lower bunk during the day, so people want to nest in the upper bunk for dozens of hours without moving?"
"There are too many refined egoists, isn't this a public place?
"This kind of problem was not discussed at all before, when the lower bunk was not sleeping, it was tacitly accepted to sit in the lower bunk, which was tacit, I don't know why there are so many things now"
"The lower berth should be shared by the upper middle and lower passengers during the day, and the lower berth will be returned to the passengers to sleep and rest after the lights are turned off at night, which is an international practice, and the lower berth spends more money to exempt the upper and lower berth passengers from the convenience of the cost, not to buy out the right to share the use of the lower berth during the day"
This part of netizens is on the side of young people:
"As a retired aunt, I really can't get used to this kind of moral kidnapping of the elderly, why can I never realize that it is my duty to let you sit, and it is my duty not to let you, and when people buy the lower bunk, they have the right to decide"
"Isn't there a seat in the corridor of the sleeper? Why do you have to sit on someone else's lower berth?
"You can buy a bunk for others to sit on, but you can't force someone else to sit on it", "I didn't hang a curtain before, but I have to hang it in the future"
"Why do you want to sit on the lower bunk that someone else bought? And this loud voice is not at all like an old man, if you want to sit on the lower bunk, why don't you let the child buy the lower bunk directly?"
"I like the young people of this class very much, first to rectify the workplace, and now to rectify the train, it is necessary for young people to treat these morally kidnapped old people"
"You all come to judge the reasoning, Ma Yun is so rich, why don't you give these 70-year-old grandparents and grandmothers, why don't you give the pensions of grandparents to beggars, is there any reason for this?"
Everyone is really noisy about whether the lower berth should be used by other people, so what are the regulations on the train?
To this, the 12306 customer service responded: "There is no clear provision that the curtain cannot be used, and it can be used without hindering other passengers."
That is to say, as long as you buy the lower berth, then the ownership of the lower berth belongs to the passenger, so naturally you can get it however you want.
The other tables and two chairs in the hallway, as well as the charging plug underneath, are common areas where you can sit casually.
In this regard, the central radio network also evaluated: from a legal point of view, who buys the ticket is in charge, logically speaking, if the other party is old and in need, it can also be resolved through negotiation, rather than standing on the moral high ground and criticizing the other party.
The reason why this kind of problem appears now is also related to the increasing awareness of personal privacy and self-protection.
In the early days, everyone only thought about how to make money to support their families, and going out was either convenient for others and themselves, or more than one thing was better than less.
So even if someone sits on their own lower bunk, it doesn't matter as long as it doesn't affect them very much.
But in modern society, everyone has high requirements for privacy, safety and hygiene, so when taking the train, they will change into a four-piece suit they carry, and they will also hang curtains, so that they will not be seen whether they are resting or changing clothes, so they are also very secure, after all, this is the lower bunk they bought, so they can toss as much as they want.
However, some elderly people still have the concept of staying in the past, feeling that it is okay for them to sit for a while, and they think that young people should respect the old and love the young, and should be more considerate of them, but they can't imagine that contemporary young people do not accept moral kidnapping at all.
In fact, this is not to say that young people are not polite and quality, after all, let is love, not let is duty, but if you have a request for others, then should you negotiate well, say your difficulties so that the other party understands, if the other party refuses, then you should also express understanding, instead of shouting at the other party for not being educated, isn't this moral kidnapping?
In addition, there are small chairs in the corridor that can be used for passengers in the upper middle bunks to rest, so why do you have to sit in the lower bunks? Is the small chair too small? Or are you used to it?
No matter what the reason, the lower bunk also belongs to the other party, the other party is unwilling, so you should honestly let it out, if you are not psychologically prepared at all, then it is better to buy the lower bunk directly when you buy a ticket.
Isn't this kind of person who doesn't want to spend more money and wants to sit on the bunk just taking advantage of a small advantage? Isn't it a big defense to angrily reprimand the other party after taking advantage of a small advantage without success?
So I also hope that this matter can give all the elderly a wake-up call, legally speaking, whoever buys the ticket then the shop belongs to whom, the other party has the right to use and ownership, and if you want to sit on someone's side, you should say it well, instead of commanding the other party arrogantly.
And under the premise that the other party is very polite and indeed has difficulties, can young people also inherit the traditional virtues of the Chinese nation, "the old and the old, the young and the young", maybe their own small help can make the other party a lot more convenient, isn't this also a thing to help others make themselves happy?
Again, everyone can understand and understand each other when they go out.
What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message to discuss!