Fifteen graduate students of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, who caused a small whirlwind on the Internet, reported the teacher's incident, and the result was surprisingly quickly resolved. Less than a week after the incident came to light, the accused teacher had lost his original title and was demoted to three levels.
At the same time, this unexpectedly opened bun door also sparked resonance and discussion among many students. Judging from the process and results, this incident has had a profound impact on cleaning up the academic environment.
When the incident broke out, the 18-page long PDF carefully produced by 15 graduate students played a good role in advocating and sounding the alarm. Based on facts and evidence, they separately described in detail the problems existing in many aspects such as morality, management, and treatment, which not only protected their own rights and interests, but also injected new blood into the academic community.
Due to the high quality of the documents and the fact that the facts were conclusive, the school quickly set about an investigation. By April 10, it was announced that it would be handled in accordance with party discipline, indicating that the matter was highly valued. To mendable note, the speed with which schools have taken action suggests that the long-standing "privilege" of teachers has waned and schools are increasingly student-centred.
In addition, the punishment result of the teacher directly losing his original title has also attracted the attention of the academic community. On the face of it, the severity of this three-level demotion may prevent some teachers from engaging in academic misconduct to a certain extent. At the same time, it also conveys to the whole society that a clean and fair academic environment is the right of every student, and any behavior that violates morality and "oppresses" others without authorization will be severely punished. This has a good reference value for establishing a correct public opinion orientation and influencing backward teachers.
The incident spread overwhelmingly on the Internet, and then unexpectedly attracted attention to the "bun door". When the young people learned that the teacher asked the students to buy 32 steamed buns at a time, a lively discussion began. Some netizens shared that they enjoyed the delicacy of steamed buns in Beijing Post, while others questioned whether the number of steamed buns was too much.
Many teachers and students said that it was really laborious to buy so many steamed buns. After learning about it, the staff of the canteen decided to appropriately increase the supply of steamed buns to meet the demand. This process of disseminating the voice of students' rights protection and solving problems has also aroused wide resonance on the Internet.
This event can be seen as a true portrayal of the "new trend". Compared with the past, students are no longer satisfied with passive acceptance, but take the initiative to stand up and express their own interests; schools no longer reject the influence of public opinion and pay more attention to the well-being of students; and the Internet also provides convenient channels for the rapid dissemination of information. And the unexpectedly popular "Bun Gate" also shows from the side that the small things in students' daily life are also related to their overall mental and physical health.
On another level, this event can also bring us the following lessons:
Teachers should set a good example. In the process of managing graduate students, no matter how strict the requirements are, they should not act in a way that harms the body and mind of others because of their power. Putting people first should be the first principle.
School supervision also needs to be strengthened. Students should not rely on reports alone, but should regularly or randomly check the front-line work to prevent the occurrence and growth of problems.
Online public opinion should not be too hasty to draw conclusions. But as a signal, it is still valuable to guide the solution of substantive problems. Schools should pay attention to it and respond appropriately.
Students' personal interests are also very important and should not be taken lightly. In daily life, we should pay attention to details and care about the real needs of students.
Overall, this incident reflects the positive adjustment of campus governance in line with the trend, and also provides a reference case for safeguarding fairness and justice. I believe that with the passage of time, our campus will be more reasonable and harmonious.
What do you think about this matter? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss