The most exaggerated report of graduate students is that 11 student citizens of Huazhong Agricultural University reported in January this year that Huang Moumou, a professor of the Department of Animal Nutrition, had academic fraud.
At that time, their reporting materials reached the point that 125 were also exaggerated. What they reported was that their supervisors had tampered with data, reused, and fabricated data in scientific research experiments, and there were academic fraud problems in many academic papers under their guidance.
And they also shouted directly in the report letter: "These behaviors not only seriously provoke academic ethics, but also cause great harm to the academic community and the whole society." Under the cover of false data and results, Professor Huang and the relevant beneficiaries not only did not receive any punishment, but also received a large amount of research funds and project grants, and also gained academic reputation and status. ”
The result of Huazhong Agricultural University's handling was to completely remove Huang Moumou from the academic circle: remove all positions in Huang Moumou's school, terminate the employment contract, and apply for revocation of teaching qualifications.
I am really impressed by the courage of the 11 graduate students, and I would rather fight the danger of not being able to graduate than pull down the academic moth. Who can not applaud them for their courage and courage? Young people should act when they should act, and there is no need to swallow their anger when they are constantly being violated. And the final result of doing so can only be to make yourself cocoon and bring endless harm to yourself.
No, on April 9, 15 graduate students from Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications jointly reported the female tutor Zheng, believing that the other party had a problem with teacher ethics and style, and also listed 23 pages of materials to record and describe in detail the fact that the tutor squeezed the students.
It was another case of collective reporting by graduate students, and it was another report of dozens of pages long. Not to mention anything else, just say that there are so many people and so many reporting materials, it is enough to see what kind of exploitation and oppression these students encountered around Zheng, so that they could not bear it anymore.
In order to make their report powerful, they not only wrote 23 pages of appeal materials, but also put in empirical materials such as chat records and audio recordings. This kind of report is to know its authenticity without looking at the report materials.
So, what are the main issues related to teacher ethics and style involved in the reporting materials?
Judging from the reporting materials, the following issues are mainly involved:
First, Zheng is emotionally unstable, and often insults students, which will also involve students' privacy. Treating students as long as they are slightly unsatisfactory is insulting and abusive, which is very unfriendly, and always makes people feel depressed and painful.
Second, she is often arranged by her to do things unrelated to scientific research, such as picking up couriers, helping her drive to and from relatives and friends, and helping corporate mentors.
Third, the student became a free nanny, and as long as it was her family's business, she would often arrange for the student to do it: go to her house to clean up, take care of housekeeping, do homework for her daughter, pick her up and drop her off school, and even help her daughter cheat on exams.
Fourth, she oppressed graduate students in various ways, not only did she save the treatment of graduate students, but even the equipment needed in the laboratory, such as mobile phones and computers, required students to pay for themselves. Shouldn't these be all provided by the school? And the question of their remuneration for their labor is also an infuriating matter, and she is always plucking the goose and will try to intercept it.
Fifth, the arrangement of work and rest time is also unacceptable, and the laboratory is on holiday all year round. In such a situation, graduate students do not even have a little time to rest, isn't this exploitation in disguise?
Sixth, there is no teacher morality, and the feelings of students are completely ignored. Whenever she thinks she has been offended, the student must keep apologizing and writing reviews until she is satisfied. This is completely disregard for students and contempt for their physical and mental health.
Seventh, morality is not matched, there is no teaching ability and academic ability, and there is no guidance for students. As a doctoral supervisor, I can't guide students to engage in scientific research, which is really a disaster for students. You must know that the academic requirements for a doctorate are very high, and you may not be able to complete your studies if you can't get the corresponding academic results. This is probably also the core of the 15 graduate students' collective report on Zheng.
It is precisely because of the accumulation of multiple factors that they said that Zheng's actions caused physical and mental harm to themselves, and they were physically and mentally tortured, and even some classmates had mental health problems, and some people had insomnia and anxiety.
At the end of the report, they also put forward their own requirements: they hope that the school will change their tutors for them and take practical measures to protect their successful graduation.
From here, we also know that they have chosen a very dangerous path, and if they fail to change their mentors, then they are likely to not be able to complete their studies. It is in this context that they propose to change their mentors. And even if they change their supervisors, they may have to postpone their completion, after all, doctoral research is not achieved overnight.
The Beijing University of Posts and Posts also made a statement: the school has paid attention to public opinion, and has set up an investigation team overnight to investigate the problem of teacher ethics and teaching style of the relevant teachers, and once the situation is found to be true, the teachers involved will be seriously dealt with.
We believe that any university will adhere to the attitude of "zero tolerance", let alone a first-class university like BUPT.
Believe in BUPT, let's wait for the results of the survey of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications!
Dear readers, what do you want to say about the 23-page report materials of 15 graduate students of BUPT?
[I am Butterfly Flower Rain Education, focusing on current affairs and the latest education trends, and I like to express my thoughts and thoughts in words. Friends who like me, please follow me: Butterfly Flower Rain Talk Education]