The US think tank deduced the conflict in the Taiwan Strait: the ammunition was urgently warned, and the PLA showed its determination to prepare for war
At the beginning of 2024, a Taiwan Strait conflict exercise orchestrated by a US think tank has caused an uproar in international military circles. The results of the exercise are shocking: Once the US military gets involved in a war in the Taiwan Strait, it may face the embarrassing situation of running out of ammunition in just one week. This prediction has not only aroused profound doubts about the combat effectiveness of the US military, but also highlighted the complexity and danger of the situation in the Taiwan Strait.
The Taiwan Strait has always been a geopolitically sensitive zone, and in recent years, it has become the focus of attention of all parties. Against this backdrop, American think tanks are trying to predict the likely course of a potential conflict through deduction. However, they came to a surprising conclusion: the U.S. military's ammunition stockpiles were rapidly depleted in the conflict and were depleted within a week. This result not only casts doubt on the combat capability of the US military, but also triggers deep thinking about the possibility of war in the Taiwan Strait.
What is the reason for the US military's ammunition shortage? The results of the exercise revealed that the PLA's powerful firepower strike capability was the main factor. In particular, its short-range and medium-range missiles, such as the Dongfeng series, have high precision and strong penetration capabilities, which pose a huge threat to the US military. In order to cope with these threats, the US military had to massively consume anti-ship missiles, which led to a rapid decline in its ammunition reserves.
In the face of the potential involvement of the US military and the results of the think tank, the PLA did not back down. On the contrary, they have shown strong determination and great strength. The PLA is ready to respond to any challenge. They possess advanced weaponry and rich experience in actual combat, and are confident in defending national sovereignty and territorial integrity in a conflict in the Taiwan Strait.
However, this deduction has also provoked people to think deeply about war and peace. War is not the best way to solve problems, peace is the ultimate goal. Peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait region conform to the common interests of compatriots on both sides of the strait and are also the universal expectations of the international community. We should resolve differences and conflicts through dialogue and consultation to avoid war.
In addition, although the results of the US think tank have aroused widespread attention, we should also look at it rationally. After all, deduction is only simulation and prediction, and does not fully reflect the real situation. The development of the situation in the Taiwan Strait is affected by a variety of factors, including political, economic, and diplomatic aspects. Therefore, we cannot make overly optimistic or pessimistic judgments based on the results of the deduction alone.
To sum up, although the results of the US think tank's deduction of the conflict in the Taiwan Strait have attracted attention, we should also remain calm and rational. We should adhere to the principles of peace, stability and cooperation, promote the peaceful development of cross-strait relations, and jointly safeguard peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. At the same time, we should also guard against interference and provocation by external forces, and firmly safeguard national sovereignty and security interests.