Lakers controversial penalty: Russell missed free throws and the referee changed the decision Zhan Huang was dissatisfied with the courtside theory 

The Lakers faced off against the Bucks, and at the end of the fourth quarter of the game, the Lakers suffered a controversial decision, and James reasoned with the referee on the sidelines.

Lillard hit a jumper in the fourth quarter, and the Bucks led by 19 points at one point. But the Lakers fought back wildly after that, Russell hit three points in a row, and thick eyebrows also scored consecutive layups, and three points also scored, a wave of 16-2, chasing only 5 points.

Thick eyebrows hit three points again, Reaves also had three points, the Lakers fell behind by 2 points, Reaves started chicken soup tactics, kept applauding, and cheered for the players. Prince made two free throws to tie the game at 101.

With 13.2 seconds left, Russell's layup was blocked by Beasley and the ball went out of bounds, and the Bucks successfully challenged the ball and the referee changed the decision. Lao Zhan was dissatisfied with the penalty and reasoned with the referee on the sidelines, thinking that Beasley had a downward pressure and hit Russell's arm and should blow a foul.

However, the referee ignored this and upheld the Bucks' ball decision, and in James's view, the Lakers really lost a lot of money this round. If a foul is called, Russell has a chance to shoot a free throw.