I never thought that I just took a photo while watching a movie, and then wrote some feelings after watching it and sent it to a circle of friends, so that I could get involved with such a serious crime as theft and infringement?
Xue Zhiqian wrote a post-viewing impression because he was full of emotion after watching the movie "Flying Life 2", but the bad thing was that his four pictures were temporarily taken in the cinema.
Because of these photos, Xue Zhiqian was first condemned by a large number of netizens and even bloggers with millions of fans, and then set off a climax of public opinion.
Later, a program invited industry insiders to explain, and made it clear that when the movie began to show and the dragon logo was lit up, we could no longer pick up our mobile phones to shoot, otherwise we would be suspected of stealing filming.
also pointed out the cognitive mistakes of some netizens, in short, you buy a ticket to buy a personal experience service for watching movies, which does not mean that you have the right to shoot and disseminate, and not shooting the big screen is a prohibited bottom-line behavior that cannot be touched.
also gave a good suggestion, if you want to match pictures and videos, you can quote the materials released by the official channels of the film, so that it will be foolproof.
The online appearance of industry insiders, listing terms and explanations in a wide range of ways, undoubtedly nailed Xue Zhiqian's behavior to the pillar of shame of stealing.
But no one expected that Yang Ma's speed was so fast, the level of experts invited was so authoritative, the terms were explained so clearly, and there was no mess under such a fast knife.
Zhu Wei, deputy director of the Communication Law Research Center of China University of Political Science and Law, has a very clear point of view: first of all, there is no such thing as piracy in the mainland, which is just a popular term for copyright infringement.
It also emphasizes that photos or clips, self-appreciation, research, teaching, evaluation or comments are within the scope of fair use and do not constitute infringement.
The scope of unreasonableness is also clear, including copying the entire film without permission, or quoting more than 50% of the text, which is not fair use.
With the end of Yang Ma, Xue Zhiqian's post-viewing feeling with pictures can be conclusive, he did not steal the photo, let alone infringe.
What's more, after the matter fermented, Xue Zhiqian himself posted that once the after-viewing feeling was released, the deity was grateful.
It should be to the effect that director Han Han is also thanking him for helping to promote the movie, and everyone is thanking him, he has a bright heart and a clear conscience.
However, it is not all unreasonable for netizens to be angry, although filming in the theater is not an infringement and theft, but at least the mobile phone screen is on and the sound of eating, kicking to the front seat will also affect the viewing experience of others, and it is also an uncivilized movie-watching behavior.
Moreover, Xue Zhiqian is a star and a public figure, and this kind of behavior of taking pictures in the cinema does have a bad leading role. It can only be said that as a public figure, you should be more cautious about your words and deeds, and there is nothing wrong with being careful.
Of course, there is still a good side to this matter, that is, the concept and scope of piracy and infringement have been deeply popularized, and I hope that everyone will be able to publicize and evaluate the work within a reasonable range in the future.